At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
Any particular issues you want help with? Calculus or something else?
plz c prob 3 here... http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/6-042j-mathematics-for-computer-science-spring-2010/lecture-notes/MIT6_042JS10_lec01_prob.pdf m notsatisfied with provided sollution here.. http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/6-042j-mathematics-for-computer-science-spring-2010/lecture-notes/MIT6_042JS10_lec01_sol.pdf
Hm. Yes, I agree that the `solution' isn't particularly satisfying. But, we can think about it a bit more. The only thing we've really concluded is that if the quiz isn't on Monday, it must be on one of the subsequent four days. But even with the given reasoning, we don't actually know if the professor will pick one of the following four days, thus still making it a surprise. It's a remarkably well-reasoned argument that doesn't speak at all to the human psychology. Even though I've rejected Thursday because I rejected Friday, the professor never rejected Friday. In short, there are two situations: the professor has reached the same conclusion as I have (no day can be a surprise), therefore when he gives it it's a surprise, or he's reached the conclusion that any day can be a surprise, but because I don't think any day can be a surprise, it's still a surprise.