Question on PSs 5 and 6: Why are the functions passing word_list around?
MIT 6.00 Intro Computer Science (OCW)
Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
Specifically: word_list is defined globally--why do functions need to get it as an argument? Is it set up that way just to provide for the possibility of using a different list?
I think it is a good design pattern. It makes the functions that use the word list independent of the word list being used. You'd be amazed at how much trouble you can get into by having too many global variables that you have to keep track of. I don't think the "different list" idea would hold water, because you could meet that objective by just supplying a different filename instead of "words.txt". I think the purpose is to minimize the number of global variables, which have a well-earned bad reputation.
Yeah, that's what it looked like to me, but I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing anything. Thanks!
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
It's definitely a good idea to do things that way. It's declared as a global variable more as a matter of simplicity than anything else. The starting point that defines the initial word list could just as easily have been in a function that was then invoked as the only thing happening at the top level; e.g.:
word_list = 
# do stuff with word_list
That makes sense--If I understand correctly, you're saying that if it was declared in the function the way you have it, it would be local to that function and thus it would need to be passed explicitly to every function that needed it. Your explanation makes it clearer. Thanks!
Correct. And in most applications, you write everything in other classes and functions, and the only thing at the very top level is a call to a function that kicks it all off.