Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

This is MJMATH, good morning to you. How would I use rationalization to simplify the expression; 9t2 --------------------- t + 2 - 2 √ t + 1 Note: above the line = 9 t squared below the line = t + 2 - 2 ( the square root of t + 1). Thank you

See more answers at
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly


Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

What exactly are you looking to do? You can rationalize the function by multiplying the top and bottom by the radical of the bottom ( (t+2)+2[(t+1)^(1/2)] ), but to be quite frankly honest, it doesn't really give you a better looking or more simple answer. By rationalizing the function, I mean moving the radical from the bottom to the top.
Hm. I think it's better looking. Doesn't the denominator disappear altogether?
Oh wait, you're right, I didn't distribute the 4 properly

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

and I meant to say the conjugate of the bottom, not the radical

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question