anonymous
  • anonymous
This is MJMATH, good morning to you. How would I use rationalization to simplify the expression; 9t2 --------------------- t + 2 - 2 √ t + 1 Note: above the line = 9 t squared below the line = t + 2 - 2 ( the square root of t + 1). Thank you
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
What exactly are you looking to do? You can rationalize the function by multiplying the top and bottom by the radical of the bottom ( (t+2)+2[(t+1)^(1/2)] ), but to be quite frankly honest, it doesn't really give you a better looking or more simple answer. By rationalizing the function, I mean moving the radical from the bottom to the top.
shadowfiend
  • shadowfiend
Hm. I think it's better looking. Doesn't the denominator disappear altogether?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Oh wait, you're right, I didn't distribute the 4 properly

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
and I meant to say the conjugate of the bottom, not the radical

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.