anonymous
  • anonymous
does anyone know the way to solve this Polynomial Inequality? x^2(3+x)(x+4)/((x+5)(x-1))>=0 I would like to know how to determine the negative and positive factors of the equation.
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
The way I always learned it was to look for critical points (I think there is a better word for this). Those would be x=0,-3,-4,-5,1 (it comes from equation given). These would be different "critical points" on a number line. Then you can test the points in between these critical points.Then we get that: x<-5, -4<=x<=-3, x=0, x>1 Note: the reason why some are < while others are <= is because if you were to examine the equation you would realize that it cannot be -5 since that would mean division by zero. On the other hand it could be -4, thus it would have that equation factor as well.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Thank you for the reply. I guess I just do not really understand these types of problems, especially the part about testing the points in between the critical points. I do appreciate your response. Perhaps I can try to find a video to explain it in more graphical terms.
anonymous
  • anonymous
It's because rational functions (rational functions are functions in which the numerator and denominator are both polynomials) are continuous whenever the denominator isn't 0. They are continuous because polynomials are continuous. Continuous functions have something called the "Intermediate Value Property." Basically, suppose that at x = a, the function is negative. Then later at x = b, the function is positive. If the function is continuous, then at some point x = c between a and b, the function must have been 0. That’s why looking for zeros and points of discontinuities is important. It tells you places where the function can change signs from positive to negative. Looking for zeros and points of discontinuities is called looking for critical points. In your function, the critical points are x = -5, -4, -3, 0, and 1. So that means if your function is positive for x = 100000, it follows that the function is positive on the interval 1 < x < infinity. That’s because there are no critical points greater than x = 1. So if f(x) is positive for some random value x where x > 1, then f(x) must be positive throughout the entire interval past x > 1. If f(x) is positive for x = -1000000, then x is positive throughout the entire interval -infinity < x < -5 for the same reason. If f(x) is positive for x = -1, then f(x) is positive throughout the entire interval -3 < x < 0, since those are the critical points that surround x = -1. We know that f(x) can’t become negative somewhere in that interval since if it became negative, there should be some other critical point in the interval -3 < x < 0, but there are none. Apply that reasoning to test whether f(x) is non-negative for the remaining intervals.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.