At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
(-1)^n / n+5
hey, how's it going?
I think I got it... I just forgot that I should use the conversion rules: Bn+1 < Bn and lim (n->inf) =0
the conversion rules? hmm, so what'd you get as the answer?
well, I got conditionally convergent. But it seems that that isnt quite right. Could you go through the steps for me?
first of all don't confuse conversion and convergence i assume it's convergence you've been talking about the whole time, right?
hahaha, yeah oops.
absolute convergence means that the absolute value converges. so you can deal with the series 1/(5+n)
did you do any tests?
I did ordinary convergence test. But that doesnt work. because I compared to 1/n, and that's divergent, but 1/n+5 is smaller than that.
do you know the ratio test, the root test, and the integral test?
yeah, but I have trouble deciding which to use.
well you just have to start trying things, don't be lazy
The issue is that when one test tells me that it's convergent, another tells me it's absolute convergent and another says divergent, I get confused. Since a function can be partially convergent etc. I need to sort out which test test what.
well, you've made a mistake if the tests are telling you different things :)
OCT, LCT, Integral, Ratio, Root, Absolute convergence By the way, the convergence rules I was talking about was the alternating series estimation theorem Which do I use first? My process right now is to use the theorem first. then if it's convergent, use one of the above. And for non alternating, just use one of the above what do you say? is there a better way?
i don't know, it doesn't matter that much what order, just start doing tests. do you just have to find out if the series is absolutely convergent?
Absolute convergent, conditionally convergent, or divergent is the exact wording
ok, an alternating series converges if the limit of the last term approaches 0, and the series is monotonically decreasing which means that An >A(n+1)
so if the terms are getting smaller, and the last term is going to 0, then it converges if it's an alternating series, so that part is not that hard