A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

luigi

  • 5 years ago

hi every body i'm a italian student of business administration of university of calabria and also i studied evalution and corporate finance... i would ask you if there is a paper of teacher damodaran that state the analisy the different approach in the financial market fundamental vs tecnhical analisys to return on the investment thank you .. luigi

  • This Question is Closed
  1. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    These are different approaches to investing, not to measuring investment returns. If that is what you are looking for, check out my book on investment philosophy or the online resources on the topic.

  2. Luigi
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    than very much for the response teacher... i will detect on your website.. SORRY, for the mistakes of written

  3. Luigi
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    dear teacher i red your " charting and technical analisys " and the article " the hidden language of the charts" about this investment approach.(opposite fundamental analisys). About you (if i understood well) the accurancy of charts, pattners, and theory of elliot and so on... haven't the skills to predicte the changes of price in the financial markets.. AND the only way to estimate the price of financial stuments is fondamental analisys ... BUT there are few (better traders) that basing of these struments forecast correctly the changes in the price and their capacity is higher in the short time..(in terms of odds) So is it possible that in absence of fundamental release or news that the hypothesis of random walk isn't valid because the trader and only the rational investors (better traders wins ) using the technical analysis and more their use these approach is less the validity of this hypothesis...? and that explain the changes in the short time? But only in the long time the better approach to investment is fundamental anylisys because the market tend to efficient. thank you

  4. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    It is possible.. but disproving the random walk is easy, Making money consistently off price patterns is much more difficult.

  5. Luigi
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i'm a lot nosy.. :):) is it possible to suppose if that the majority of investors are tecnhical ... then specific pattners ( triple bottom , head and shoulder, candlelisticks, resistance &support.. and so on..) will predicte an specific movement in the market and it will occurs.. because the ones believe in that...and for example for stocks is impossible that the price of market is a good proxy of economic value of firm..... is it possible a positive correlation beetween bias of economic value of firm and number technicians??

  6. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.