3 point mass of 4g placed at x=1,3,-6. where should a point fourth mass of 4 gm be placed to make the center of the mass at the orgin?

- anonymous

- Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com

Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)

- katieb

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

- anonymous

is that 4 g mass distributed all on the x-axis at those points or are there other y -coordinates, or 3d coords?.

- anonymous

thry sre sll distributed on the x axis

- anonymous

they are all*

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- anonymous

i did the problem and got 4x-8/16 the answer is 2 but i do not know what i did wrong

- anonymous

give me a little, I'm working it out

- anonymous

k

- anonymous

it looks like the sum of all of the moments of mass (1g) * distance from the origin divided by the sum of the masses has to equal zero. so\[[(1g)(-6)+(1g)(1)+(1g)(2)+(1g)x]/(4g)=0\], x solves to be 2, which makes intuitive sense because on the -x side of the system you have a moment of -6g and if you were to add the moments on the +x side you would have 6g and a center of mass at 0

- anonymous

shouldn't the denominator be 4x4x4x4

- anonymous

no because the total amount of the mass is 4g, distributed over 4 points right?. Now if there are four points with 4g a piece, you would still use the same equation but instead of one gram *x you would use 4g*x and the denominator would be 4*4

- anonymous

center of mass = sum of the moments of mass / the sum of all of the masses. Whereas a moment is the mass *a considered distance

- anonymous

yes thats what i meant , its suppose to be 16

- anonymous

so shouldnt it be 4(x)+4(-6)+4(1)+4(3)/16=0

- anonymous

so then it would be 8

- anonymous

right

- anonymous

when i solved for it it become 4x-8/16=0

- anonymous

the 16 automatically falls out in the beginning being multiplied by 0

- anonymous

essentially it does not matter what the denominator is because the center of mass has to fall at zero in which case the numerator is the deciding factor

- anonymous

oh thats so funny

- anonymous

i didnt even realize that

- anonymous

It happens all of the time

- anonymous

ty u so much im gonna become a fan do u think u can help me with another problem of center and mass

- anonymous

sure, what's the question
no problem by the way

- anonymous

a rod of length 2 meter and denisty =3-e^-x kg per meter placed on the x-axis with its ends at x=+1 and -1. find the coordinate of the center mass

- anonymous

i plugged into the formula but im stuck on the integration part, i think

- anonymous

so if the density of the rod is 3-e^(-x) the moment should be \[\rho \int\limits_{-1}^{1}xf(x)dx\]. But that formula is for uniform density. This question is saying that the density is changing in y for values of x. Unless I'm interpretting it wrong. Is the shape of the rod 3-e^-x from -1 to 1? If so, then we need avalue for the density coefficient. I would think

- anonymous

otherwise it is the density value of that function at zero, which 2, times the integral mentioned before,, where the f(x) = the line y=0, and therefore the center = 0

- anonymous

That has to be the case because, the question would not have mentioned that the rod lies on the x-axis. It would have said something like it follows the shape of the curve of a function above or below the x-axis on that interval

- anonymous

do u have a cramster account

- anonymous

I do.

- anonymous

if u can u look at the problem and help me

- anonymous

hughes hallet 5th ed number 23

- anonymous

I'm trying to pull it up, In the mean time I was thinking thatmaybe we could sue that density eq, and calculate the mass, and the moments at -1 and 1, then use the same formula as before.

- anonymous

what chapter?

- anonymous

8.4

- anonymous

ohh sry i meant to say 25

- anonymous

number 25

- anonymous

no drry 23

- anonymous

23 is right

- anonymous

it's not letting me get to either one for whatever reason, might be a prob with the site. Truly though, if it explicity says that 3-e^(-x) is the density of the rod. then they might be just asking for you to intuit that you can pull out the mass, (because the rod is 2m) and then calculate what the center would be, via the last problem.

- anonymous

k

- anonymous

does that make sense at all?

- anonymous

yah ill figure it out ty

- anonymous

i have to go but ill be back later ty for ur help

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.