anonymous
  • anonymous
PLEASE SOLVE :) let R be the region bounded by the graph of y=x^2 -1 and the graph of x=y^2 .... find the volume of the solid generated when r is rotated about the vertical line x=2, and then write an integral expression that can be used to find the volume of the solid generated when R is rotated about the line y=-1
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
I can get you started, but I may have to leave soon. If I help you set up the volume element, can you integrate from there?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Well, I'll start anyway...
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'm going to send through an image of the plots you need to look at.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
ok thanks!
anonymous
  • anonymous
anonymous
  • anonymous
this is hard without a calculator. I got the integral would be \[\pi*\int\limits_{?}^{?}(2-y^2)^2-(2-\sqrt{y+1})^2dy\] and then i would need a calulator to get the limits where the two function are equal...is it supposed to have such nasty algebra or did I mess up soehwhere?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Assuming your equations are correct, the shaded region is what you're looking at. I would plan on using cylindrical shells, and doing the integral in two parts: one where\[y=\sqrt{x}\]and one where\[y=-\sqrt{x}\]and then add the volumes up.
amistre64
  • amistre64
plotting it was easy :) how we find the solutions? or is there another way?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Actually, put cyl. shells on hold. When I first looked at your problem, I took the y-axis as a natural bound, but that's not the case since it's not in your question. When considering the region shaded, discs may be better. I want to work it out.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'm deriving it - it's easy to do on paper, but hard to explain. online
amistre64
  • amistre64
deriving sounds interesting.... would you see where the slopes are perp to each other?
amistre64
  • amistre64
been trying to solve it like system of equation....but no luck; then again, i could be missing something glaringly obvious :)
anonymous
  • anonymous
the integral came out \[\pi*[y^5/5-4y^3/3-y^2/2+8/3*y^(3/2)-y]...\]
amistre64
  • amistre64
jpick: you just subtract the equations from each other?
anonymous
  • anonymous
but to get bounds for y i have to solve the values where y^4-y-1=0
amistre64
  • amistre64
yeah.... been trying that one for hours :)
amistre64
  • amistre64
just thinking outloud, but would newtons approximation work for us? or is that just to clumsy?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Okay, it seems whatever method you use here (cylindrical shells or discs) the algebra is going to be crappy.
amistre64
  • amistre64
loki... :) i agree
anonymous
  • anonymous
Given that, I'm going to persist with cylindrical shells.
anonymous
  • anonymous
maybe, some numerical approximation (or algebra solver program) will be needed
amistre64
  • amistre64
finding the bounds is like pulling teeth, but without the lollipop at the end :)
amistre64
  • amistre64
is it possible to set your own bounds and still get an answer?
anonymous
  • anonymous
not sure what you mean? the bounds of integration are set by the intersection, or do you mean the approximation getting close enough will be our "own bounds"
amistre64
  • amistre64
either way... I was wondering if going further than the bounds would have a canceling out effect, but most likely that is just wishful thinking
anonymous
  • anonymous
Okay, the basic construction for the cylindrical shell is\[\delta V = 2\pi(radius)(height)(elemental.thickness)\]\[=2\pi (x-2)(\sqrt{x}-(x^2-1)) \delta x\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
where...
anonymous
  • anonymous
this element is for the section to the right of the line in the following image.
anonymous
  • anonymous
1 Attachment
anonymous
  • anonymous
A similar situation will arise with the section to the left, where you have\[\delta V=2\pi (2-x)(\sqrt{x}-(-\sqrt{x})) \delta x=2\pi(2-x)(2\sqrt{x}) \delta x\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
There's a mistake in the first element: x-2 should read as 2-x, the radius.
anonymous
  • anonymous
You need to communicate with me. Is this working for you?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Your limits of integration for the element I just derived above (the one with 2sqrt{x} for height) will be from x=0 to x=t where \[-\sqrt{t}=t^2-1\] (i.e. get a number out for t).
anonymous
  • anonymous
that will work, the only thing we need are the actual bounds, either in terms of x or y. I do have one question for you lokisan about the earlier differential equation thread. I got a different answer than you, even though we did it the same way given it was an exact equation
anonymous
  • anonymous
The limits of the initial section I derived will be from x = the t you just found to x=s where \[\sqrt{s}=s^2-1\](i.e. get an approximation for s).
anonymous
  • anonymous
Which d.e.?
anonymous
  • anonymous
The one where he wanted substitution?
anonymous
  • anonymous
bethanymichalski, you there?
anonymous
  • anonymous
yeah, I got x^2/2+y^/2+xy-x=c
anonymous
  • anonymous
That's what I got using exact differential equation.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Oh, i thought it said log(x+y)...my bad nm :(
anonymous
  • anonymous
oh, he wanted to use a substitution method in the end. I didn't bother to check if the answers were the same, ;p

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.