At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
sub in the (x+h) for the values of x in f(x), and subtract f(x). Expand out the f(x+h) and simplify all of your variables. You should end up with\[(h^2+2xh+5h)/h\], the h factors out and you 2x+5, if you take the limit as h goes to zero, which is actually what you are trying to get at in most general purposes.
so it would be f(x^2+5x-1 +h)-X^2+5x-1 divide by h
actually it is \[([(x+h)^2 +5(x+h)-1] - [x^2+5x-1]) / h\]. You see, for every value of x in f(x), we are putting x+h in. It is just like putting a constant in like f(5), only it is f(x+h). Does that make sense?. Then you go ahead and expand everything out.
im not sure how to expand it =(
okay, the next step is \[([x^2+2xh+h^2+5x+5h-1]-x^2-5x+1)/h\]. You go ahead and square the x + h, and distribute the 5 to (x+h), and make sure to distribute the negative to the f(x) values.
Do you have any problems factoring or multiplying variables and constants, like (x+5)(x-2), or anything like that?
wats the step after that cuz i got that part
(2xh+5h+h^2)/h , that turns into 2x + 5 +h after factoring out the h. .If you were to take the limit as I mentioned, you would sub in 0 for h and get 2x+5. Work on getting the factoring and multiplying down, because it's pretty common where you're at right now and onward. If you have any other questions feel free to ask. : )
thnk you im a fan =)
No problem, thanks for the nod