anonymous
  • anonymous
how do you determine the final terms in a telescoping series when the cancelling terms are not consecutive?
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Foolproof method: If you can't figure out a smart way, just write out the first 2/3/4 terms and check
anonymous
  • anonymous
There will be better ways to figure it out, but that may be the most general/hardest to get wrong one.
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok, I will try that now... stuck on a problem

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
You could post it, if you wanted ¬_¬
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok, that might help... \[\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} 2/n ^{2}-1\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
I understand how to do the partial fraction decomposition
anonymous
  • anonymous
I am getting stuck on the final terms when I sub in the series and cancel out
anonymous
  • anonymous
how do I arrive to the following answer....
anonymous
  • anonymous
\[s _{n}=1 + 1/2- (1/n-1) - (1/n)\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
Write it out something like this (I would) 1/1 - 1/3 + 1/2 - 1/4 + 1/3 - 1/5 ..... +1/(n-4) - 1/(n-2) +1/(n-3) - 1/(n-1) +1/(n-2) - 1/(n) If you start cancelling in pairs, you see that from the start only 1 + 1/2 don't cancel ... you could 'guess' that the second half of the last two will stay, but if you write out the last three too you can show this.
anonymous
  • anonymous
so the last two terms in the last two parentheses stay?
anonymous
  • anonymous
or the last two iterations
anonymous
  • anonymous
not parentheses
anonymous
  • anonymous
I don't see how you are coming up with the last 3 terms with the n...??
anonymous
  • anonymous
See cancelling in image
1 Attachment
anonymous
  • anonymous
As for the last terms, just sub in n-2, n-1 and n to the partial fraction 1/(n-1) - 1/(n+1)
anonymous
  • anonymous
I guess that is what I don't get... why am i subbing in n-2, n-1, and n? is that always?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Well, if it's a sum from 2 to N, it will include 2, 3, 4 .... n-3, n-2, n-1 and n etc. Why do you ONLY go back to n-2? The difference in the partial fractions n-1 and n+1 is 2, so you can 'guess' that that will cancel back with the one two behind, so you need the last two at the end (but I used three so you can 'check' that they cancel how you think they will (see diagram).
anonymous
  • anonymous
You could sub in the first 5 and the last 5 if you have enough time, just to make sure. Or none, if you can guess which will stay. Just depends on how confident you are.
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok, I think I understand.... thank you, Mr. Newton :)
anonymous
  • anonymous
No problem

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.