anonymous
  • anonymous
With the S&P outlook downgrade for the United States, do you still consider the riskfree rate to be the treasury bond or would you now consider it to be some alpha over the treasury bond?
Finance
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

anonymous
  • anonymous
Personal opinion: I would still consider the treasury bond as risk free. Do you really think that today, because of S&P downgrade, there is more chance of default ? I do not think so... Please others, comment on that question, it is interesting. I am curious to receive any theoretical answer.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I agree that Treasuries will still be viewed as the 'de facto' risk free rate. But, with the forward looking negativity... do we need to start thinking about a risk premium for USD (i.e. dollars) similar to how we do for other countries/currencies? At our current debt trajectory, I feel a solid argument could be made for 'yes'. But then I remember our Fed has no problem printing endless supplies of money. Sigh.
anonymous
  • anonymous
We should not only be considering the risk of default but also other risks. the RFR should be the same because there is nothing less risky i.e. it is the minimum possible amount of risk, even if not 100% guaranteed. you could say that the RFR is the return for Systematic Risk.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.