At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
i tryed to do it on my own but didnt work and looked at examples and still didnt work.
g(x)= x2 is an upward parabola with axis (0,0)... have u got that??
if u put Y= y-3 ... and X= x ???
have you seen the picture
I could not see it...access denied...sad times
thtss weird it let me see it
You can attach the image to the problem directly rather than linking it.
Ok, so the graph is the same as \(y = x^2\) But it's shifted down 3 units. So how will the y values of the graph relate to the y values of \(y=x^2\) for a particular value of x?
can i just have the answer just to see what you put tht i didnt put i had (x+-3)^2
If we call F(x) the y value of the function and G(x) = \(x^2\). What is F(x) in terms of G(x)?
idk , (x+1)^2
If x = 0, what will F(x) be?
Is that what your graph shows? Here's a better question. If H(x) is just had a parabola that looked exactly like \(x^2\) but was shifted down 3 units. What would H(0) be?
\(0^2 = 0,\) but our H(x) is shifted down 3 from this graph, so H(0) would be?
And if x = 1?
What is \(G(x) = x^2 =?\) and what is our hypothetical H(x) ?
No. If x=1, then \(G(x) = (1)^2 = 1\) And since H is still shifted down 3, we'd have H(x) = 1-3 = -2. So we can see that for any given value for x, H(x) = G(x) - 3
look i dont knoww this stuff , im just about to give im seriously
You're doing fine, but I'm trying to take it one step at a time and lead you to the concepts that will allow you to solve these quickly and easily. I think part of the problem is that you imagine that you just aren't going to be able to understand and therefore try to just guess at a solution to get it over with.
Do you have a little bit of time?
yess , alot
Ok. Lets start over then. Forget about this problem for a second. And lets take a look at a simpler problem.
If I have a function G(x) = x, What does that look like?
yess , alot
No, G(x) = x. What does the graph of this look like?
I haven't said anything about F(x) yet ;) be patient =)
look idk , its crazzy i just need the answer so i can move on i know that your trying to help me and to get better at my math but i just need the answer
Getting the answer will not help you on the test.
it will .
You said you have time. Please also have patience also.
this is in a time thing so yeaa .
G(x) = x is just a line passing through the origin. When x = 0, G(x) = 0, when x = 1, G(x) = 1, and so on.
okay that was more simple next step
Now lets say we have another function F(x) that is the same shape (a straight line with a slope of 1) but it's not going through the origin. It is shifted down 3 units. \(x = 0 \implies F(x) = ? \) \(x = 1 \implies F(x) = ? \)
Given how I have discribed F, what will F(0) be?
If G(0) = 0, and F(0) is the same as G(0) but shifted down 3 units.. What is F(0)?
look im geting confused , this math is stressing mee outt , like really
Deep breath. If G(0) = 0, and F(0) is G(0) but shifted down 3 units, wouldn't F(0) = 0 - 3 = -3?
ive been said -3
You said -3 about something else. I said we were starting over with an easier problem.
What is F(1) ?
manee , can you just tell me the answer because ive been stuck on the same question for like an hour
If you are not interested in learning, I'm not interested in teaching. No I won't help you cheat.
then flutter you then lame