At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions.

See more answers at brainly.com

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions

ok ill try to work it out and see if i get anything different

the only difference in the website is that they kept 1 - P/M in the partial fractions

whatcha got?

the suspense is killing me

this is so freaking frustrating!!!

it should matter

ahh that could be it, by us splitting up the fraction we may have changed the constant

we get two different answers

After you have solved for the constant? (You may well do, I haven't tried after that)

oh i didnt try that

you have a point though, suppose i multiplied top and bottom by M, the C could absorb one of the M's

for my solution

no you cant do that, then the C's would be different

there is something seriously wrong here and i cant find it

what did you get ?

can i see what you got

thanks for your help btw

Sorry, first is 1+ Ce ... in the fraction :/

so ok

i see the latex

here is an idea, but it seems silly, define a new constant

multiply top and bottom by M, then define a new constant C* = M*C

oh , thats bad symbols, one sec

Yes, I don't see why you can't do that (but it seems unnecessary).

well it doesnt explain why i get the same answer using partial fractions

also you should have a plus there, not a minus

you wrote P = M Ce^kt / ( 1 - Ce^kt), in latex

Oh, I corrected it the post below

ok thanks :)
so the final answer comes out the same ,

Indeed :D