A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

anonymous

  • 5 years ago

Why is the series (-1)^n(n^(1/2)/(n+7)) conditionally convergent? Please help, I have a midterm on this in 4 hours!

  • This Question is Closed
  1. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    A series converges but diverges absolutely is said to be conditionally convergent.

  2. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I realize that. But the problem is when I tested for absolute convergence by taking the absolute value of An --> | (n^(1/2))/(n+7) |, I found that it |An| converged. Or maybe I did something incorrectly.

  3. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I am brushing up on my infinite series, however, if you take the lim as n goes to infinity of n^(1/2)/n it goes to 0 which confirms what you found that it converges

  4. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ^^^ this is not true, just because the limit of terms approaches 0 doesn't mean the series converges.

  5. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    In fact n^(1/2)/(2*n) = 1/2 * n^(-1/2) < n^(1/2)/n+7) = |An| By the p-series n^(-1/2) diverges and therefore |An| also diverges

  6. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Great. the n^(1/2) is a clue to manipulate for p series.

  7. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Sorry, my computer went crazy

  8. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    YESSS thaanks! Saved me. Im a little more prepared for this test now.

  9. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yeah, with these kinds of problems you want to look at the ratio of the n-to-some-power terms, in this case we had n^(1/2)/n^1 so n^(-1/2), we then realize it must diverge. Because we intend to show it diverges we choose a simpler term that is less than |An| and show that it diverges, thereby implying |An| also diverges. In my previous response i used n^(1/2)/(2*n) < n^(1/2)/n+7) which is true after some n and showing that n^(1/2)/(2*n) diverges is far simpler. Obviously if you found that a sum converged then you would find some simple terms Bn > An and then show that sum Bn converges.

  10. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yes but convince me that 1/2n<1/(n+7)

  11. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Oh, I just picked it up: it is true after some n.

  12. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    can it be that the problem can be written into ((-1)^n)*((n^(1/2)/(n+7))) it would totally be easier

  13. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    how is that any easier? That was just a couple extra brackets

  14. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Thanks for the review adfriedm. If you don't continue to do these things every day, you forget it.

  15. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    first of all, the n^(1/2) means that it has to be 0 or positive number. (-1)^n means its positive or negitive. if you determine (n^(1/2)/(n+7)) you can see its value decreases and comes to nearly 0. so the series will become a convergent. ps. http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=find+sum+%28-1%29^n%28n^%281%2F2%29%2F%28n%2B7%29%29+ (you can check the answer here)

  16. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    We were talking about it being absolutely convergent

  17. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    well if you try calculating each number... a(0)=0 a(1)=-1/8 a(2)=2^(1/2)/9 a(3)=-3^(1/2)/10 a(4)=-2/11 ... a(infinity) nearly 0 if you sum them up it will come close to a number. and from the previous link it is nearly -0.0516833.

  18. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Just because a(inf) = 0 doesnt mean that the sum of a(n) has a finite value. Have a look at the harmonic series.

  19. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    oh forgot that.. sorry

  20. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    wait a moment. if a(inf) was nearly 0 then if we sum it up it will be nearly the same number, example s(inf)will nearly be equal to s(inf-1) and s(inf+1)will nearly be equal to s(inf) meaning the more we add to it the less it changes proving that this sequence is a convergent

  21. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.