A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing


  • 5 years ago

In the Clip 5: Ballistic Pendulum (12 min) of Momentum of the MIT classes, he calculates “h” using a approximation of h=x2/2L. I don’t understand why he does that, he could simply use Pythagoras to find h0 and then h = 1m-h0. Please, if someone could help me I would appreciate it.

  • This Question is Closed
  1. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    He starts off using the Pythagorean theorem, but points out that h is very difficult to measure when the angle is only 2 degrees. He goes on to use x^2/2L because one can measure x with much less relative error. The only reason is to keep the error in the answer small (which is one was Physics differs from mathematics - understanding error is important!)

  2. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yes, I understand why he messures X insted of h, is very clever. What confuses me is why he uses x^2/2L instead of use Pythagorean with: h=100-ROOT(100^2-3,5^2)=6,127mm, which is a exact result (no an approximation) and uses a more familiar formula. (The other method gives 6,125mm). Thanks

  3. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...


  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.