At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
dude, stop asserting an opinion. everything occurs for a reason. think about it. why were we building atomic plants in the first place? (written by an agnostic himself)
its a logical argument
NOT an opinion
if you saw a house on fire, and heard a baby crying, it would be evil to walk by and ignore the helpless baby. true or false?
counterfact: humans built a freakin nuclear plant in japan counterfact: humans are causing deforestation. conclusion: we are making our own problems.
that is an opinion too, no way to avoid it
this has nothing to do with nuclear plants
Claim: God is evil or impotent. Proof: Assume the contrary, ie God is neither evil nor impotent. Fact: God allows infants to suffer and die in natural disasters who cannot sin or be tested. Fact: A loving god would not allow an infant to suffer and die. Contradiction! Conclusion, we must reject the assumption that god is neither evil nor impotent in which case god is either impotent or evil.
darn it, tell me, does god manipulate the laws of physics at his own will?
god hears babies screaming in houses on fire. and in natural disasters, they get squashed like watermelons in earthquakes for example
dude, you are not answering my question
god hears the crying, he should not ignore it. he is omnipotent , correct?
well if he cant manipulate nature, then he isnt omnipotent
if he cant "intervene" with nature, what good is god then?
you have a deist god i suppose
im saying if he wants to if he manipulates nature, the balance of everything will be tipped. no, im an agnostic, i worship no god yet does not deny the possible existence. i worship the laws of physics
if he were to stop the magnetic angular momentum of Earth's core, he may very well be able to prevent an earthquake.
i dont think you can worship a law of nature, lol
but think about what that implicates. no spin, no gravity, no force to keep air on Earth, no air to breathe EVERYONE DIES
god created physics for a reason
in fact he defined the set of rules IN ORDER THAT we may be able to survive
what makes you say that if god intervenes the laws of nature will be ruined
did you read my previous post?
im not talking about earth stopping rotation, lol
yes, im saying theres an infant in a house on fire, or an earthquake
god prevents earthquake, god has to first stop the rotation of the earth, no rotation, no gravity, no air, death
what do you expect god to do, put out the fire?
rescue the baby
he is "god" after all
god creates, god defines.
when the cavemen asked "why are we here?" they thought of god
if god truly is a diety, god is insubstantial, and so he cannot walk the earth.
read some greek mythology. after all, roman mythology and later the bible came from it.