anonymous
  • anonymous
(3x+2)/(x-5)≤ 0
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
ohhhh, nice pic
anonymous
  • anonymous
wowowowowowo
anonymous
  • anonymous
seriously?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
wowowowowowow chick a bow wow
anonymous
  • anonymous
you have two cases
anonymous
  • anonymous
-_-
anonymous
  • anonymous
+ / - and - / +
anonymous
  • anonymous
:)
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok so far?
anonymous
  • anonymous
yupp
anonymous
  • anonymous
those two cases will make it < = 0
anonymous
  • anonymous
so first case + / - , we have (3x + 2) >= 0 and denominator < 0
anonymous
  • anonymous
aren't they both less than 0?
anonymous
  • anonymous
no then you will have negative/ negative wich is positive
anonymous
  • anonymous
gotcha
anonymous
  • anonymous
remember denominator cannot equal zero
anonymous
  • anonymous
thats why x-5 < 0 , not x-5 <= 0
anonymous
  • anonymous
now give me medal,
anonymous
  • anonymous
not until you show me how to do this problem
anonymous
  • anonymous
awwwww
anonymous
  • anonymous
To get cantorset's attention, just have a pretty picture :P
anonymous
  • anonymous
yeah, so he can be an retriceand not focus on the task at hand.
anonymous
  • anonymous
He's trying to get achievements and medals, nothing more. Do you still need help, alexghe92?
anonymous
  • anonymous
yes please, sorry for the confusion before.
anonymous
  • anonymous
sorry im multitasking
anonymous
  • anonymous
I got a medal for my answer here :D
anonymous
  • anonymous
whoa, why am i an retrice
anonymous
  • anonymous
although I don't deserve it :(
anonymous
  • anonymous
you are a jerk. what makes you so special i have to answer this
anonymous
  • anonymous
what gives you this sense of entitlement. im done here
anonymous
  • anonymous
i gave you plenty of information , yuo just want me to spoon feed this
anonymous
  • anonymous
good luck
anonymous
  • anonymous
retrice
anonymous
  • anonymous
k bye.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I don't think she needs you anymore, since she has Quantum :P
anonymous
  • anonymous
Okay, so right now, you can let it behave as though it's an equation and say that (3x+2)/(x-5)= 0 (for simplicity's sake). Then, multiply both sides by x-5, but on both sides it just disappears, leaving you with 3x+2 = 0. Subtract two, and divide by 3, to get x ≤ -2/3, after replacing the "=" with "≤" (in this case, the direction of the inequality doesn't change, so you don't lose any information by converting between the two. Hope that helped
anonymous
  • anonymous
that wont work quantum
anonymous
  • anonymous
lol
anonymous
  • anonymous
How?
anonymous
  • anonymous
scroll up , there are two cases
anonymous
  • anonymous
+ / - and - / + for when the inequality < = 0
anonymous
  • anonymous
i started the first case
anonymous
  • anonymous
but im just an retrice what do i know
anonymous
  • anonymous
If you're going to type a response, type it in one swoop, don't just break it up into several just to get your achievements.
anonymous
  • anonymous
you have more cases than just x < = -2/3, its a compound inequality
anonymous
  • anonymous
quantum, well im not getting paid
anonymous
  • anonymous
oh god, i just squashed my nads, i was crossing legs
anonymous
  • anonymous
cant breathe
anonymous
  • anonymous
brb, im answering other questions btw
anonymous
  • anonymous
youre right, the second answer is 5.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Alright, I think I made a mistake with my sign change from the l.e. to =. Because you had something in the denominator, it does flip to "greater than or equal to", and thus you have x is greater than or equal to -2/3. And, to have the case that cantorset was talking about, you have to have some region where x-5 < 0, which gives you x < 5. So, we now know that x satisfies the expression anywhere in between -2/3 and 5, including -2/3, and excluding 5.
anonymous
  • anonymous
(It's been such a long time since I worked directly with inequalities! xD )
anonymous
  • anonymous
youve been a bunch of help though, I haven't done these problems since the beginning of the semester and my final exam is on tuesday so I just needed to refresh. Thank you!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Glad to help. :)
anonymous
  • anonymous
so you guys didnt answer this , i will answer it, one sec
anonymous
  • anonymous
-2=3x since (3x+2)/(x-5)\[\le\]0 multiply the (x-5) on each side, on the left side it cancels out, on the right side its 0 (0 times any number is 0.) then remove the parenthesis, subtract two, which gets you 3x=-2. you can simplify this further, which will get you a decimal. (which, im also not going to do.)
anonymous
  • anonymous
Cantorset, it's answered. Definitively.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.