At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
109 should be \[10^9\]
The equation I used was y' = r(1 - (y/L))y The solution is y(t) = L / [1 + [(L/y0) - 1] ]e^(-rt) where y0 is y naught and represents the initial population. I initially solved for the rate using the DE. 2*(10^9) = r(1-(10^9/5*10^9))10^9 I found r and then plugged and chugged with the solution. My answer was incorrect. Any ideas? How do I find the rate? I feel as if that is incorrect.
Haha you're making it much more difficult than it has to be. Try just doubling the initial value 4 times?
There is a limiting factor of 5*10^9 individuals, so that needs to be accounted for in the calculation. I have to use the equations above to calculate amount at t =4. I took the logistics law equation y' = r(1 - (y/L))y and used that to find the rate. (r= rate, y= population, L = limiting factor) 2*(10^9) = r(1-(10^9/5*10^9))10^9 I multiplied by 2 because the population initially doubled.
What do you get when you double 4x?
Then wouldn't it make sense that the population stops at 5e9? That's the property of the limit.
It's carrying capacity. After a certain point, an ecosystem can't hold more individuals. At that point deaths or offspring decrease and growth stabilizes.
Meaning a plateau, right?
the logistics equation needs to be used
Alright, well then by definition the highest a population can get is the limiting factor. So, take the limit of the equation, and you'd get the 5e9, so that would be one way to use the equation to show that that is the highest it can get.