A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing


  • 5 years ago

Hello, I'm studying energy right now and I don't understand something: if we have a disk rolling without slipping, then obviously there is friction to induce the rolling right? So if we were to model this with an energy equation, would we have U + Wf = K where U is potential energy, Wf is work due to friction, and K is kinetic energy? OR would you have U = K + Kr where Kr is rotational energy? or some combination? Thanks!

  • This Question is Closed
  1. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Total Mechanical Energy for Linear and Rotational Motion of a Solid: ME = KE + RE + PE = (1/2)mv^2 + (1/2)Iw^2 + mgh did that help ?

  2. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Why can't you/don't you account for work done by friction?

  3. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    No the friction from the rolling will cause it to stop. Roll a ball in a flat surface and it will eventual stop. The force that made it roll was the push. If you are talking about a disk that is rolling down a ramp the force that is causing it to roll is gravity. At the top you have only potential and in the bottom you have kinetic. There are more forces that affect the problem such as gravity and air resistance and its really hard to include all of them. In cases or linear and rotational motion we only include gravity but in the real world if you measure the values its not going to match up because like you said there are other forces. So what you can do is use what you expect the energy to be using the formula that Mathmind posted and measure that actual results and use your equation to account for friction and all the other forces but then it gets complicated because you have to find by how much does kinetic affect the problem and as well as air drag. The reasons we decide to exclude those forces is because they have minimal affect. I know you probably know that static friction has a big coefficient but as you go to rolling friction the coefficient goes to a very low number. That's why when people assume that rolling is causing a ball to continue to roll but it's actually a force acting apposite of it and causing it to stop. Sorry this was long hope this helps.

  4. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...


  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.