• anonymous
what's the difference between a diatribe and an ad hominem argument?
  • Stacey Warren - Expert
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at in under 10 minutes. Go to now for free help!
  • anonymous
Google it
  • rainbow
An ad hominem argument is based on personal attacks, not a rational response to the issue at hand. A diatribe is a tirade, denunciation: i.e., a venomous speech or writing. The difference between the two terms is based on whether or not the argument is personalized, addressing the character of another. [For example, during a debate on global warming, a speaker might say "Only a slimey character like you would back global warming."] In other words, a diatribe speaks to the argument and ad hominen speaks to the person making the argument. Neither logically addresses the substance of the argument.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.