Find all pairs (x,y) of integers such that

- anonymous

Find all pairs (x,y) of integers such that

- schrodinger

See more answers at brainly.com

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions

- anonymous

\[1+2^x+2^{2x+1}=y^2\]

- anonymous

Would it be correct to assume this cannot be solved algebraically, and instead I should be considering the graphs or something?

- anonymous

Sure it can, but it requires the use of logarithms.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- anonymous

No. It can be solved algebraically.

- anonymous

Ugh, I just assumed, as I am used to similar problems where algebra will not work. OK then.

- anonymous

I see. Take your time; you're not expected to solve it quickly.

- myininaya

i guess we will use the quadratic formula to solve for x to tell us what the y can be
y is in (-inf,1)U(1,inf)

- myininaya

he seems like anything in this form with the restriction above is fine (ln((-1pm sqrt(8y^2-7)/4)/(ln2),y)

- anonymous

Well I can give a hint, if you want.

- myininaya

no!

- anonymous

OK. I didn't quite get the restriction you made there.

- anonymous

I might go to bed very soon. I will post the solution when I walk up. You may want to try factorizing some way.

- myininaya

##### 1 Attachment

- myininaya

anwar thats what i did to get the restriction

- anonymous

I see. That was nice, but don't forget the question is only asking for pairs of integers.

- myininaya

ok i will think more

- anonymous

Mmmm...I don't think x can be negative. Starting at x=0, y =+/-2, so (0,2) works and may be the only pair (looking at the discriminant of your equation in cal0001.pdf of sqrt(8y^2 - 7) which must be a perfect square before x can be an integer). The only ones that work are y = 1, 2 and 4. But y^2 can't be 1 or 16, so maybe (0,2) is the only solution.
I look forward to Anwar's solution.

- anonymous

Perhaps two solutions (0,2) and (0,-2)?

- anonymous

4,23 is also a solution. (and 4,-23, if you want).

- myininaya

guyc that was a very good observation about the square root having to be a perfect square
lol

- myininaya

i mean for the thing under the square root to be a perfect square

- anonymous

INewton, how did you get (4,23). Btw myininaya y=23 makes the discriminant a perfect square (in fact sqrt(8(23)^2 - 7) = 4225, which is the square of 65

- anonymous

It would be nice to be able to generalise from these trial and error results. I wonder is simple number theory would tell us all the y's making the discriminant a perfect square?

- myininaya

ln16/ln2=4
we can get this 4 by plugging 23 where that y is for the equation i have solved for x

- anonymous

Not quite with you

- myininaya

what?

- anonymous

Oh, nothing clever. Not completely random, but the form I have it isn't good enough to find all solutions, but to make finding them quicker. Eugh, this problem eludes me. As a general rule, I dislike solving over integers ¬_¬ I guess I'll wait for the solution.

- anonymous

Me too

- anonymous

You guys did a great job; actually you found all integers pairs that satisfy the given equation. Here is the official solution, as this is an IMO problem.

##### 1 Attachment

- anonymous

xD.
A little harsh giving people IMO problems without giving the source. The problems I gave were 'hard', but were only STEP (aimed at ~ top1/2% of Mathematicians in the UK, or around 1000 people) - not the top few hundred in the world.
Still, it's nice to know that even (SOME certainly not ALL) IMO problems are not exempt from seeming 'easy' once you have seen the solution (though getting it on your own is of course completely different).

- anonymous

Incidentally, we didn't do 'well'; solutions without proof in an olympiad scores a nice 0.

- anonymous

Sorry, I probably didn't make it obvious in those posts: This IS a very nice question.
I'm just not IMO standard :(.

- anonymous

I am sorry for being "a little harsh", but I am glad you think it's a very nice problem. The problem that's easy to solve does not add much to your knowledge. It's good to solve hard ones from time to time; I mean problems that you think they are above your level. Anyway, it's your turn now :)

- anonymous

I feel bad that this will be too easy :( But I think it is a cute problem:
Show that if:
\[\int \frac{1}{u\ f(u)}\mathbb{d}u = F(u) + c, \text{ then } \int \frac{m}{xf(x^m)}\mathbb{d}x = F(x^m) + c\ (m \not= 0)\]
Hence find:
\[\int \frac{1}{x^n-x}\mathbb{d}x; \]
\[\int \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^n+x^2}}\mathbb{d}x. \]

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.