anonymous
  • anonymous
when using the dividend discount model it gives us immediately the price per share.Why don't we take options into account given that option holders might have a claim on future dividends?
Finance
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Are you discounting dividends per share or aggregate dividends? If aggregate dividends, then your model gives you the aggregate market cap of the firm, which will be shared among all equity holders including option holders. You can use other methods to calculate the value of any options and warrants and subtract this from total market cap to get the value of shares outstanding. If you are discounting dividends per share, then your dividend growth rate should take into account, implicitly or explicitly, the issuance of additional shares underlying options and warrants, and their dilutive impact on dividends per share. If the dividend growth rate you are using is based on historical trends or averages, then it probably includes some dilution from options that are exercised each year.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.