anonymous
  • anonymous
(2|x|)/x if x<0
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
-2
watchmath
  • watchmath
when x<0, |x|=-x. So your expression is equal to 2(-x)/x = -2.
myininaya
  • myininaya
2(-x)/x=-2

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
i got that x<0 therefore x<0 |x|= -x -x =-x -2x/-x=2
anonymous
  • anonymous
|x| does not equal -x. The x in the absolute value sign can equal -x though. The absolute value sign will make the x positive. So your equation becomes: 2x/(-x) = -2. <--- this takes into account x<0
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok i dont understand anymore
anonymous
  • anonymous
x<0 means that x is negative right? So just pretend x is positive and add the negative signs to the problem: 2|-x|/(-x) absolute value sign makes x positive: 2x/(-x) ---> 2/(-1) ---> -2
watchmath
  • watchmath
Shifty you just need to use the definition of absolute value: \[|x|=\begin{cases}x &\text{ if } x\geq 0\\ -x&\text{ if } x<0\end{cases}\] Since \(x<0\) you may replace the \(|x|\) by \(-x\).
anonymous
  • anonymous
aha hahaha thank you
anonymous
  • anonymous
watchmath, you are wrong. The absolute value cannot be replaced by a negative. The variable inside the absolute value can be negative, but the outcome would be positive.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Nevermind watchmath, I see what you did. But you didn't fully explain it correctly.
watchmath
  • watchmath
So how the full explanation looks like?
myininaya
  • myininaya
watch is right if you plug in a number less than 0 |x|=-x a negative times a negative is positive so -x is actually positve
myininaya
  • myininaya
the above is assuming x<0
myininaya
  • myininaya
-2<0 |-2|=-(-2)=2 see?
anonymous
  • anonymous
That's where watchmath's explanation was lacking. watchmath: "when x<0, |x|=-x. So your expression is equal to 2(-x)/x = -2" watchmath made the absolute value -x rather than -(-x). Unless he/she canceled out negatives from the numerator and denominator.
watchmath
  • watchmath
hmm think again ...
anonymous
  • anonymous
... I'm assuming you already took into account that x<0 when you made this equation:2(-x)/x = -2 But if you did, you're missing a -x in the denominator unless you are just implying that x is negative and leaving it as x. But in this case it just causes more confusion for the original poster. I find that people find it easier to work with positive numbers rather than negative numbers.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.