anonymous
  • anonymous
let T,U be two linear operators on a vector space V, Show that TU and UT have the same eigen values.
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'll get you started. Suppose that \[\lambda\] is a non-zero eigenvalue for TU. Then \[ TU v -\lambda v = 0 \] for some non-zero vector v. So, applying U to both sides, \[ UT (Uv) -\lambda U v = 0. \] So long as Uv is not zero this means that \[\lambda\] is an eigenvalue for UT. But Uv can't be zero because then TUv would be zero, so \[\lambda\] would have been zero to begin with. The case of zero eigenvalue can be done similarly. Does anybody know how to make an equation appear inline rather than on its own line? I'm new here.
anonymous
  • anonymous
how about this let Tv = av and Uv = bv a and b are the respective eigen values. TUv = Tbv = bTv = bav UTv = Uav = aUv=abv=bav so TUv =UTv =bav so UT and TU must have the same eigen values.
anonymous
  • anonymous
No, you've assumed that T and U have the same eigenvector v. This is not part of the hypothesis and might not be true in general. You must start with the assumption that you have an eigenvalue for TU (or UT) then show that this is an eigenvalue for UT (or TU), with no particular assumptions about the eigenvector. You see in my explanation above that we end up with Uv an eigenvector for UT when we start with v an eigenvector for TU, both with the same eigenvalue.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
but the eigen values a and b are not the same
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yes, but you've assumed that Tv =av and Uv = bv, i.e. that v is a common eigenvector for T and U, even though there are different eigenvalues. A common eigenvalue does not always exist, and even if it did it would not solve the original problem. Start with an eigenvalue for TU, then show that it is an eigenvalue for UT (in case with different eigenvectors). See if you can follow the argument in my first post.
anonymous
  • anonymous
cool. so we must assume that the eignevectors are not the same too thanx.
anonymous
  • anonymous
No assumptions on the eigenvectors. Assume a is an eigenvalue for TU, show that a is an eigenvalue for UT.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.