anonymous
  • anonymous
How to check AT SIGHT whether a limit exists or not? for ex.: lim(x->2){5/(rt(2)-rt(x))}
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
amistre64
  • amistre64
5 ------------- if the top can cancel out the offending bottom sqrt(2) - sqrt(x) then we can control the function There is no way for '5' to control the bottom of this
amistre64
  • amistre64
there is a vertical asymptote at 2; not a hole.... if we had a whole, a limit would exist; if we had a hole we could rewrite it to an equavilant form without a hole
amistre64
  • amistre64
if both sides of the asymptote go to the same infinity tho, we might be justified in saying the limit is +- infinity

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
left hand limit goes to -infty and right hand limit is +infty. therefore limit doesn't exist. Now considering asymptotes is not "at sight" mathematics!!!
anonymous
  • anonymous
PS:u are not given the graph of this function
amistre64
  • amistre64
asymptotes is 'at sight' when you know what to look for in the equation...
amistre64
  • amistre64
a vertical asymptote occurs when you cant eliminate the offending zero by a like term in the numerator
amistre64
  • amistre64
x^2 -9 ---------- has an issue qt -3; but that issue is resolved by the top (x+3)(x+2)
amistre64
  • amistre64
(x+3)(x-3) --------- ; the (x+3)s cancel out and we are left with just a hole (x+3)(x+2)
amistre64
  • amistre64
if there is no way to control the offending zero in the bottom; we get an asymptote...
anonymous
  • anonymous
even if there is an asymptote how will you say both parts of the curve go to same infty i.e. both go to +infty/-infty or one goes to + and other to -infty?
amistre64
  • amistre64
a sign chart helps :) You know what the zeros are; so plot out there signs on a chart and you will see which side is neg and pos
amistre64
  • amistre64
if there is only one zero; its most likely opposites, but that aint a general rule because its determined by the equation
amistre64
  • amistre64
<..... 2 ......> - 0 + ------------ -inf VA inf ; for this one tho

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.