double integral

- M

double integral

- schrodinger

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions

- anonymous

What do you need answered??

- M

trying to use equation to write question but not working

- amistre64

yeah, they blame it on user error lol

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- M

hmm i click and nothing

- amistre64

{SS} dx.dy ; [a,b] [c,d] works

- anonymous

hey amister!!!

- amistre64

hi ;)

- amistre64

i saw a cute pic and figured... why not help lol

- M

when you switch from 1 to 2 for dx and 0 to lnx for dy
you end up with 0 to ln2 and e^y to 2

- M

it's impossible to do this without equation lol

- amistre64

is it dx.dy order ; or dy.dx order?

- M

but shouldn't dy switch to 0 to 2?

- M

going from dydx to dxdy

- amistre64

so your re adjusting the intervals right?

- M

answer book has it 0 to ln2

- M

switching the order

- amistre64

{S{Sdy}dx} ; x interval = [1,2] ; y interval = [0, ln(x)] originally right?

- M

yeah

- amistre64

then teh easiest thing to do is graph it; with the lines y=0, y=ln(x), x=1, x=2

- M

when you switch shouldn't it be [0, 2] and [e^y, 0]

- M

i mean [0, 2] and [e^y, 2]

- amistre64

##### 1 Attachment

- M

yeah i drew the pic but can't figure out the limits

- amistre64

this is the area we want, you agree?

##### 1 Attachment

- M

very nice yes

- amistre64

then we determine the switch this way right?

##### 1 Attachment

- M

yeah

- amistre64

{S{S} dx} dy} ; new y = [0,e^2] then, we want it a straigh line ...

- amistre64

ln(2) = y
and new x = [e^y, 2]

- amistre64

new y = [0,ln(2)]
new x = [e^y,2] ; you said the book has an answer?

- M

yeah

- amistre64

y = ln(2) at the top right?
so new y = [0,ln(2)]

- M

that makes sense but when i look at another problem
[0, 1] [4x, 4] dydx switches to [0, 4] [0, y/4] dxdy

- amistre64

##### 1 Attachment

- M

whoops ignore that
it's [4, 0 ][0, sqrt x]dydx to [0, 2][4, y^2]dxdy

- M

[0, 4][0, sqrt x]dydx to [0, 2][y^2, 4]]dxdy

- M

^^ that's correct one lol

- amistre64

gonna make me draw another pic aintcha lol

- M

if i do it like the way you did it then should it new become [0, sqrt x][y^2, 4]dxdy?

- M

lol you dont have to

- amistre64

but I did lol

##### 1 Attachment

- M

yeah

- M

this is so confusing

- amistre64

##### 1 Attachment

- amistre64

your just switching out the new for the old; it takes practice, but clearly define the old and new

- M

but the new limits would be [0, sqrt x][y^2, 4]dxdy

- M

but answer says [0, 2][y^2, 4]dxdy

- M

can you tell where i'm getting confused?

- amistre64

look at the picture; the new limit goes to 0,2 becasue its no longer a part of the curve...

- amistre64

sqrt(x) is an old limit for an old y; that curve is no longer a part of the new y

- amistre64

just like old x = 0 is no longer a part of new x interval;

- amistre64

new y matches old x in that it is a limit that is defined from a point to point....
new x matches new y in that it is a limit from a curve to a point.....

- amistre64

its like reading a map backwards to get back home .... you have to reorient it to make sense

- M

i think im going to have to look at all the pictures again very slowly by myself lol

- M

thanks for the help! need to start from top again

- amistre64

good luck ;)

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.