Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
Hoot! You just asked your first question! Hang tight while I find people to answer it for you. You can thank people who give you good answers by clicking the 'Good Answer' button on the right!
It was a debate between Sen. Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Sen. Hayne of S. Carolina over a protective tariff that would protect northern factories against European factories. Hayne disliked the tariff because it would have no good effects on the south which was where S. Carolina is (all of America's manufacturing took place in the north in this time period). Actually, it would be bad for the south because it would mean southerners would have to pay more for northern goods. Webster favored the tariff because it would protect northern manufacturing against European competition by raising the price of foreign goods so American goods would seem cheaper.