Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

alfers101 Group Title

proof that square root of 2 is irrational

  • 3 years ago
  • 3 years ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. saifoo.khan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Let's suppose √2 were a rational number. Then we can write it √2 = a/b where a, b are whole numbers, b not zero. We additionally make it so that this a/b is simplified to the lowest terms, since that can obviously be done with any fraction. It follows that 2 = a2/b2, or a2 = 2 * b2. So the square of a is an even number since it is two times something. From this we can know that a itself is also an even number. Why? Because it can't be odd; if a itself was odd, then a * a would be odd too. Odd number times odd number is always odd. Check if you don't believe that! Okay, if a itself is an even number, then a is 2 times some other whole number, or a = 2k where k is this other number. We don't need to know exactly what k is; it won't matter. Soon is coming the contradiction: If we substitute a = 2k into the original equation 2 = a2/b2, this is what we get: 2 = (2k)2/b2 2 = 4k2/b2 2*b2 = 4k2 b2 = 2k2. This means b2 is even, from which follows again that b itself is an even number!!! WHY is that a contradiction? Because we started the whole process saying that a/b is simplified to the lowest terms, and now it turns out that a and b would both be even. So √2 cannot be rational.

    • 3 years ago
  2. alfers101 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    thank u so much for all your help :)

    • 3 years ago
  3. saifoo.khan Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Np Man!

    • 3 years ago
  4. joemath314159 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Theres another good proof using the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, im gonna up load it in a sec. It starts out the same way though, assume its rational.

    • 3 years ago
  5. alfers101 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    ok

    • 3 years ago
  6. joemath314159 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Alright, the goal is the same, force a contradiction. The Fund. Theorem of Arithmetic lets you prime factor a number. In this proof, you prime factor a and b, then count the number of primes on both sides of the equation. If the numbers were equal, they would have the same prime factorization. but thats impossible for this case.

    • 3 years ago
    1 Attachment
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.