At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
And if any lifesaver knows to answer to his question?
Right, there is the possibilty that a neophyte might not stay a neophyte for very long ie they have knowledge but they have to start at the bottom anyway.
the "rule" should be: that any answers given have to be explained ....
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
I agree with that completely, I am really thinking it can be quite difficult for a skilled math person to "talk to" a "real" neophyte (unless they have teacher training or something equivalent).
And reading many posts of the simpler kind with a one number reply from an expert is a bit depressing.
the "something equivalent" might be an inate ability to express the math in a language that can be comprehanded by the "neophyte".
and as a side note, these titles they dole out should not be viewed as the intelligence level of the person asking or answering. All it does is indicate how long a person has actually used the site ...
Yes, I understand that, I did think about that.
As I said a neophyte that is not really a neophyte will not stay like that for long.
The neophyte of the "2+2" troublemaker variety will be discouraged if he can't get the attention he thinks he deserves.
On the other side, it gives (real) lifesavers a chance to practice and advance.