Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

Hey everyone/anyone, Interesting question I can't seem to answer: What do you call a common noun being used as a proper noun? (i.e. when you refer to someone as "Dad/Father"?) Is it some kind of pronoun? Thoughts?

Writing
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer

SIGN UP FOR FREE
A common noun names general items. It is broken down into common or proper. Saying Dad is a proper noun, whereas using something general like parent, would be considered a common noun. dad and Father can both be considered not-so-general titles, thus it may be classified into proper nouns. Just my thoughts, might want to research it a little more.
Thanks for the thoughts, my question is should we classify those "not-so-general" titles that are standing in for proper names. I did a bit more research but have only found a [presumably new] idea called 'capitonyms' - complete homonyms that only have different meanings because one is capitalized. (god/God, jack/Jack, etc..) Couldn't find a formal definition of such a thing. My actual question is if this is still a proper noun or should be viewed as a new classification of common noun. A 'capitonym' can only be defined in written word, as you can't capitalize a spoken word. I have dubbed it, in my confusion, an 'eponoun'. (Eponymous noun) In that we are putting a name on someone or something - an eponym - based on the noun we know them by. An eponym is a specific kind of proper noun. However, an eponym is actually a noun made from someones name - which is the opposite of what I'm think of: calling someone a name made from their noun. This 'eponoun' may in truth be just a reverse eponym. But then eventually we would using names, about nouns we made up, based on names we made up. (See Illustration 3 below) Illustrations: (aka Word Calculus) 1.We name an object a "fred" (common noun) because the object was invented by a guy named "Fred" (proper noun). {This is an eponym.} 2.Instead of calling someone by their actual name, "Frank", we call him "Tank" because he reminds us in some aspects of a tank - which is an object. {This is my 'eponoun'.} {[Use: "Hey, Tank, what's up?"]} ((It is a proper noun because we are using it as his name, but it is not actually his name! So is it still a proper noun? If so what kind?)) 3.Finally, what if that 'fred' object that Fred the person made (in Illustration 1.) becomes a household item. Now 30 years later Frank (in Illustration 2) has a son named Tobias or something. But all of Tobias's friends think he looks like or acts like a 'fred' that all those friends know because they use one in their house often. So Tobias's friends start calling him "Fred" as a joke - and maybe it sticks. Now, WTF just happened!? We have three words that all came from one made up syllable/sound. We have Fred the name, then fred the object, then Fred the name based on a similarity to the object made by the original person named Fred that wasn't based on anything. An eponym has been turned into a eponoun, that later might be turned back into a different eponym that means something entirely different! AND THEY'RE ALL HOMONYMS (same spelling, same sound, different meanings) As you can see, Illustration 3 (above) is a recursive thought that can keep building. So we need a way to clarify each idea along the way :/

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question