Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

Form the contrapositive: If I do not wash my clothes, then I will have nothing clean to wear. If I have nothing clean to wear, then I did not wash my clothes. If I do not wash my clothes, then I will have something clean to wear. If I wash my clothes, then I will have something clean to wear. If I have something clean to wear, then I washed my clothes. If I have something clean to wear, then I did not wash my clothes.

Mathematics
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

if i was wash my clothes, then i will have something clean to wear.
First identify your p and your q
I discussed this before. However, I will talk about it again.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

The contrapositive of \(p \implies q\) is \(\neg q \implies \neg p\)
You can make sense of this intuitively, or by following the rules of modus ponens to prove it rigorously.
We will start by identifying the statements \[p = \text{ "I washed some clothes"} \]\[q = \text{ "I have something clean to wear"}\] We have \( \neg p \implies \neg q\) therefore the contrapositive is \(q \implies p\)
\[p: \text{I have nothing to wear}\]\[q:\text{I did not wash my clothes}\] You have an implication of the form: \[p\implies q\] The contrapositive is: \[\lnot q \implies \lnot p\] So first what is \(\lnot q\)? "I washed my clothes" What is \(\lnot p\) "I have something to wear" So the contrapositive of the original would be : If I washed my clothes, then I have something to wear
Or you can start with negated forms and swap them as Alchemista did.
Polpak your answer is wrong.
If I have something to wear, then I washed my clothes.
Oh, bother. I read the wrong statement as the original because of how it's formatted. "If I have nothing clean to wear, then I did not wash my clothes." I thought that was the original implication.
Might be a good idea to remove the answer, so as not to confuse the original poster.
ok i think mine sounds right!
Well operating from the premise I gave, I'm correct. But my correct answer is not the answer to the original poster's question.
Keebler01, the correct answer is "If I have something clean to wear, then I washed my clothes."
i wasright!!!!
No. Your answer and Alchemista's are different.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question