anonymous
  • anonymous
Form the contrapositive: If I do not wash my clothes, then I will have nothing clean to wear. If I have nothing clean to wear, then I did not wash my clothes. If I do not wash my clothes, then I will have something clean to wear. If I wash my clothes, then I will have something clean to wear. If I have something clean to wear, then I washed my clothes. If I have something clean to wear, then I did not wash my clothes.
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
if i was wash my clothes, then i will have something clean to wear.
anonymous
  • anonymous
First identify your p and your q
anonymous
  • anonymous
I discussed this before. However, I will talk about it again.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
The contrapositive of \(p \implies q\) is \(\neg q \implies \neg p\)
anonymous
  • anonymous
You can make sense of this intuitively, or by following the rules of modus ponens to prove it rigorously.
anonymous
  • anonymous
We will start by identifying the statements \[p = \text{ "I washed some clothes"} \]\[q = \text{ "I have something clean to wear"}\] We have \( \neg p \implies \neg q\) therefore the contrapositive is \(q \implies p\)
anonymous
  • anonymous
\[p: \text{I have nothing to wear}\]\[q:\text{I did not wash my clothes}\] You have an implication of the form: \[p\implies q\] The contrapositive is: \[\lnot q \implies \lnot p\] So first what is \(\lnot q\)? "I washed my clothes" What is \(\lnot p\) "I have something to wear" So the contrapositive of the original would be : If I washed my clothes, then I have something to wear
anonymous
  • anonymous
Or you can start with negated forms and swap them as Alchemista did.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Polpak your answer is wrong.
anonymous
  • anonymous
If I have something to wear, then I washed my clothes.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Oh, bother. I read the wrong statement as the original because of how it's formatted. "If I have nothing clean to wear, then I did not wash my clothes." I thought that was the original implication.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Might be a good idea to remove the answer, so as not to confuse the original poster.
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok i think mine sounds right!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Well operating from the premise I gave, I'm correct. But my correct answer is not the answer to the original poster's question.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Keebler01, the correct answer is "If I have something clean to wear, then I washed my clothes."
anonymous
  • anonymous
i wasright!!!!
anonymous
  • anonymous
No. Your answer and Alchemista's are different.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.