is this a function or relation? (3,1), (3,2), (3,3), (3,-2), (3,0)

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions.

A community for students.

is this a function or relation? (3,1), (3,2), (3,3), (3,-2), (3,0)

Mathematics
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

no it's not a function
if we define the first components to be inputs; and the second components to be output; then this is not a function
If one input has more than one output, its not a function by definition

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

Exactly because a function is defined as being one to one
not one to one perse; unless im misunderstanding the vernacular
many to one is fine, one to one is invertible; but one to many is not a function
Hmm, I thought I remebered the def being that. Oh well
x^2 is a function, but it is not one to one (-2)^2 = (2)^2 = 4
Ahh yes you are very much so correct, makes more sense that way :)

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question