A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
 3 years ago
Hey guys , i am currently in lecture 10. I totally understand where the linear approximation comes from. But i don;t quite get how we derived the quadratic approximation. Has the professor explained it already or did he just state it with a plan of explaining where it comes from later. I assume it has something to do with Taylor expansion?
 3 years ago
Hey guys , i am currently in lecture 10. I totally understand where the linear approximation comes from. But i don;t quite get how we derived the quadratic approximation. Has the professor explained it already or did he just state it with a plan of explaining where it comes from later. I assume it has something to do with Taylor expansion?

This Question is Closed

FabianMontescu
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1There's a good explanation in the end of lecture 9 when he does a quadratic approximation of a quadratic equation, and proves (as expected) that the best quadratic approximation of a quadratic equation is itself. Using the lecture clips from the Scholar 2010 course is sometimes confusing  I'm following the lectures from the 2006 and checking with the 2010 website.

sneumoin
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yes, you are right. You can see the quadratic approximation as Taylor expansion but without terms whoose order higher than 2.
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.