Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

LuckyF00L

  • 4 years ago

Hey guys , i am currently in lecture 10. I totally understand where the linear approximation comes from. But i don;t quite get how we derived the quadratic approximation. Has the professor explained it already or did he just state it with a plan of explaining where it comes from later. I assume it has something to do with Taylor expansion?

  • This Question is Closed
  1. FabianMontescu
    • 4 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    There's a good explanation in the end of lecture 9 when he does a quadratic approximation of a quadratic equation, and proves (as expected) that the best quadratic approximation of a quadratic equation is itself. Using the lecture clips from the Scholar 2010 course is sometimes confusing - I'm following the lectures from the 2006 and checking with the 2010 website.

  2. sneumoin
    • 4 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yes, you are right. You can see the quadratic approximation as Taylor expansion but without terms whoose order higher than 2.

  3. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy