


This Question is Closed

3lroy
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
i do not understand the equation

LagrangeSon678
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
perhaps you shold start by isolating "n" on one side of the equation

3lroy
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
yh
but that doesnt solve the equation it just changes it

LagrangeSon678
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
right, but this person is trying to solve for n

3lroy
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
ok then n is fn

LagrangeSon678
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
are you sure about that

3lroy
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
yeah bringing n to one side and the others on the other its pretty clear

LagrangeSon678
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
let me show you:
dw:1318000734645:dw

LagrangeSon678
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
dw:1318000783381:dw

LagrangeSon678
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
you just got schooled

3lroy
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
nop there was an n on the other side of the equation

3lroy
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
so u did not get it how could u be that dumb

LagrangeSon678
Best Response
You've already chosen the best response.
0
obiviously you are the only dumb one here, if you think that an equation can ever contain the symbol ;