At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
That's the answer I was looking for(:^^
it's not true. the i one is fallacy due to square roots of a negative number
and joe i'm not sure how you get x+x+x+x+x = squared
its always fun to try and find the mistakes lol.
well everyone thinks that the i one hold true
but it doesn't
it has to do with only being able to split positive integers of a square root into two
square root properties only work when a>0
so no... no matter how many times your teachers and students tell you.. 1=2 there will be a fallacy in their work orrrr.. a fallacy within the theorem.. but usually they will restrict it as the people who wrote them were absolute geniuses
Wow..Ya'll are way to smart for me..only highschool..lol
i used to watch my teacher do things like this in highschool and i just thought wow my teacher just proved something wrong... really he was trying to make someone stand up and say he was wrong
By the way, 1 does not equal. 2. 'i' is being used as a number, of which it is not. 1=2 is an 'imaginary' answer so to speak.