anonymous
  • anonymous
Is it true that 1=2?
Mathematics
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
false
anonymous
  • anonymous
yep, see attached :})
1 Attachment
anonymous
  • anonymous
That's the answer I was looking for(:^^

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
hahaha
anonymous
  • anonymous
1 Attachment
anonymous
  • anonymous
it's not true. the i one is fallacy due to square roots of a negative number
anonymous
  • anonymous
and joe i'm not sure how you get x+x+x+x+x = squared
anonymous
  • anonymous
its always fun to try and find the mistakes lol.
anonymous
  • anonymous
well everyone thinks that the i one hold true
anonymous
  • anonymous
but it doesn't
anonymous
  • anonymous
it has to do with only being able to split positive integers of a square root into two
anonymous
  • anonymous
square root properties only work when a>0
anonymous
  • anonymous
indeed. :)
anonymous
  • anonymous
so no... no matter how many times your teachers and students tell you.. 1=2 there will be a fallacy in their work orrrr.. a fallacy within the theorem.. but usually they will restrict it as the people who wrote them were absolute geniuses
anonymous
  • anonymous
Wow..Ya'll are way to smart for me..only highschool..lol
anonymous
  • anonymous
i used to watch my teacher do things like this in highschool and i just thought wow my teacher just proved something wrong... really he was trying to make someone stand up and say he was wrong
anonymous
  • anonymous
By the way, 1 does not equal. 2. 'i' is being used as a number, of which it is not. 1=2 is an 'imaginary' answer so to speak.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.