anonymous
  • anonymous
need help on attachment @Calculus1
Mathematics
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

anonymous
  • anonymous
1 Attachment
anonymous
  • anonymous
attachment is broken
anonymous
  • anonymous
1 Attachment

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
i m sorry i cant do it
phi
  • phi
|dw:1320794476045:dw| It's a lousy picture, but it is trying to show that Ln (the y value of each rectangle is the y value of the curve on the left side of the rectangle) is less than the area under the curve, because the curve is "increasing continuous function". The area Rn (each rectangle takes the y-value of the curve from its right side) is greater than A. so (1) Ln Rn-A from (2), we can substitute for Rn-Ln to get (3) Rn-A < (b-a) ( f(b)-f(a))/n
phi
  • phi
A nicer picture
1 Attachment

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.