A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
anonymous
 4 years ago
Is it possible to convert from an explicit equation back to its implicit equation? Suppose I have the following explicit equation: \[\left \{ (\frac{1}{2}\frac{3}{2}t, \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}t,t)t \in \mathbb{R}\right \}\]
Possible to change this back to its implicit form?
anonymous
 4 years ago
Is it possible to convert from an explicit equation back to its implicit equation? Suppose I have the following explicit equation: \[\left \{ (\frac{1}{2}\frac{3}{2}t, \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}t,t)t \in \mathbb{R}\right \}\] Possible to change this back to its implicit form?

This Question is Closed

JamesJ
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Do you, mean for example, as z = t, then x = 1/2 ( 1  3z) y = 1/2 ( z  1) ?

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0oh..I meant the above explicit form of the equation was derived from the system of equations (implicit form): \[x+y+z=0\]\[xy+2z=1\] So after getting the explicit form, can I change the explicit form back to this implicit form?

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0But how do I find the equations of the planes? Is there a systematic way to do this? Probably a linear algebra way? I tried to solve for its nullspace and all of that but none of the ways lead me back to the implicit form of the 2 equations.

JamesJ
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Oh wait. No. Think about this for a minute. The number of planes that contain one line in 3D space is infinite.

JamesJ
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Therefore there are an infinite number of planes that can intersect to give that plane.

JamesJ
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Hence once given such a line, there is no unique solution to the question "what are the planes that intersect at that line."

JamesJ
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1So coming back to your question: yes, you can find any number of "implicit forms". But you may not find the original pair of planes/pair of equations.

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So it's kind of like a one way thing where I could change from an implicit form to an explicit form. After which, from the explicit form, I cannot change back to the original implicit form any more?

JamesJ
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1You can change back to A implicit form. But it many not be THE implicit form with which you started. So if you like, the operation from implicit forms to explicit forms is not a onetoone operation.

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0ahh.. Thanks you so much! :)
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.