Is it possible to convert from an explicit equation back to its implicit equation? Suppose I have the following explicit equation: \[\left \{ (\frac{1}{2}-\frac{3}{2}t, -\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}t,t)|t \in \mathbb{R}\right \}\] Possible to change this back to its implicit form?

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions.

A community for students.

Is it possible to convert from an explicit equation back to its implicit equation? Suppose I have the following explicit equation: \[\left \{ (\frac{1}{2}-\frac{3}{2}t, -\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}t,t)|t \in \mathbb{R}\right \}\] Possible to change this back to its implicit form?

Mathematics
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

Do you, mean for example, as z = t, then x = 1/2 ( 1 - 3z) y = 1/2 ( z - 1) ?
oh..I meant the above explicit form of the equation was derived from the system of equations (implicit form): \[x+y+z=0\]\[x-y+2z=1\] So after getting the explicit form, can I change the explicit form back to this implicit form?
But how do I find the equations of the planes? Is there a systematic way to do this? Probably a linear algebra way? I tried to solve for its nullspace and all of that but none of the ways lead me back to the implicit form of the 2 equations.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

Oh wait. No. Think about this for a minute. The number of planes that contain one line in 3-D space is infinite.
Therefore there are an infinite number of planes that can intersect to give that plane.
Hence once given such a line, there is no unique solution to the question "what are the planes that intersect at that line."
So coming back to your question: yes, you can find any number of "implicit forms". But you may not find the original pair of planes/pair of equations.
So it's kind of like a one way thing where I could change from an implicit form to an explicit form. After which, from the explicit form, I cannot change back to the original implicit form any more?
You can change back to A implicit form. But it many not be THE implicit form with which you started. So if you like, the operation from implicit forms to explicit forms is not a one-to-one operation.
ahh.. Thanks you so much! :)

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question