Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

Identify the Horizontal Asymptotes of g(x) = (3x+2)/((x^2)+4)^(1/2))

Mathematics
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

|dw:1321422281732:dw|
The answer is at 3 and -3
how would I go about finding those answers? :/ my teacher hasn't taught us how to find it with radicals in the denominator, so I'm lost.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

well you look at the ratio of the exponents. The numerator is 3x and the denomintor will just be x. it is x^(2*1/2) = x so the ratio is just 3x/x. As x goes to infinity you get a horizontal asymptote of 3 As x goes to negative infinity you get a horizontal asymptote of -3
Thank you so much!
understand? I know it probably sounds very confusing
I kind of get it, but would it just be 3, then because if I substitute a large negative number for x it is a negative over a negative, and I would still get a positive 3
if you know how to differentiate it , then differentiate it w.r.t x and equate the answer to 0
i dont think she is at that type of math yet, that will be too complex at this point
yeah
sorry guys i am new to this so i do not know your standards
No the answer will be -3 as you approach -infinity because you need to take into account the ratio 3/1
the top will outdo the bottom in this case, a very large negative number times 3 will approach -3 faster then the denomnator will reduce it to 3. Understand? it is confusing but take a second to think about it
It's alright, thank you for trying to explain it to me Asanka. I think I just visualized it, and it seems to make sense if the numerator is going three times as fast. Thanks a lot for all your help :)
exactly you got it! anytime
I am attaching the solution hoping it will help
Nice work! very neat.. but you can just look at the ratio of like exponents to make it a little easier, but either way nice job
Thank you very much

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question