Ace school

with brainly

  • Get help from millions of students
  • Learn from experts with step-by-step explanations
  • Level-up by helping others

A community for students.

Exponential growth and decay: what exactly does 0

Mathematics
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

To see the expert answer you'll need to create a free account at Brainly

It does
no it means that b is between 0 and 1
which means it has to be a decimal

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

you cant have a whole number between 0 and 1
lol
really? like for example 3.14?
how is 3.14 smaller then 1 and larger then 0?
and i don't really understand how the graph is supposed to be, how is it different from b > 1
no it has to be between 01 and 1
or perhaps the decimal \[\frac{1}{3}\]
I suppose it has to be of the form 1/a where a>1
0 and 1 i meant
point i was making is that 3.14 is a "decimal" but it is not less than 1 for that matter so is the decimal 100
But to get back to the actual question: if 01 you have exponential growth: |dw:1322013236762:dw|
is it like 0. then whatever number?
0
oh so reading from left to right
satellite, the 3.14 logic is flawed. the relevance of 3.14 being decimal has nothing to do with 0
"decimal " is not a synonym for numbers between 0 and 1. decimal just means base ten representation
so the decimal has to be 0.whatever number?
like 0.8 or 0.08302
no 5 is a decimal, 19.95 is a decimal
for the 0
are you there?
I know. but the existence of a decimal larger than 1 does not influence the existence of a decimal less than 1 and greater than 0. just read your previous message about 3.14 closely. although this is a useless debate, the definition of a decimal was just misinterpreted and I agree with you on 0
but what kind of decimal does it have to be? something like 0.3 and 0.30823 or something like that?
in base 10, yes. anything like 0.05878 or 0.99 or w/e. just less than 1 and more than 0
ok thanks to all of you who answered it's clear now

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question