At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions.

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions

It does

no it means that b is between 0 and 1

which means it has to be a decimal

you cant have a whole number between 0 and 1

lol

really? like for example 3.14?

how is 3.14 smaller then 1 and larger then 0?

and i don't really understand how the graph is supposed to be, how is it different from b > 1

no it has to be between 01 and 1

or perhaps the decimal
\[\frac{1}{3}\]

I suppose it has to be of the form 1/a where a>1

0 and 1 i meant

But to get back to the actual question:
if 0**1 you have exponential growth:
|dw:1322013236762:dw|**

is it like 0. then whatever number?

oh so reading from left to right

satellite, the 3.14 logic is flawed. the relevance of 3.14 being decimal has nothing to do with 0**
**

"decimal " is not a synonym for numbers between 0 and 1. decimal just means base ten representation

so the decimal has to be 0.whatever number?

like 0.8 or 0.08302

no
5 is a decimal, 19.95 is a decimal

for the 0**
**

are you there?

I know. but the existence of a decimal larger than 1 does not influence the existence of a decimal less than 1 and greater than 0. just read your previous message about 3.14 closely. although this is a useless debate, the definition of a decimal was just misinterpreted and I agree with you on 0**
**

but what kind of decimal does it have to be? something like 0.3 and 0.30823 or something like that?

in base 10, yes. anything like 0.05878 or 0.99 or w/e. just less than 1 and more than 0

ok thanks to all of you who answered it's clear now