At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
what's the right answer?
ans to nahi pata to he post kara he lekin 1,2,19,18 nahi he
ho bhi nahi sakta?
?? right or wrong?
i am not really understand wat the question want >.>
himanshu explain the question..
yaar 40kg ka weight ko 4 piece me torna he jisse 1kg se 40 kg ke sabhi mass 1 ya 1 se jada piece ka use karke sabhe ko weigh karna he
hmm don't think this is right either.
i assure u it is. the problem is an old one from Bachet's 'Problems plaisants et delectables'
well then tell me how with this combination u can get a weight of 2,5,7,8....... ?
you have a point there, the version i remember did not place a restriction of 4 weights to the solution.
ya i guess this restriction is just the problem here
You can weigh a 2 by putting a three on one side, and a one on the other. Ditto for 5 (9 vs 3+1)
It's an old problem from pre revolution France. The conventional way of thinking was that the mass being weighed on the balance had to be measured with a number of the weights on the opposite side. The solution here is to realise that you can also add weights to the side being weighed. So 1 is weighed conventionally but 2 is weighed with a 3 on one side and a 1 being added to the side being weighed, etc 1, 1 2, 3, -1 3, 3 4,3,1 5,9,-3,-1 6,9,-3 7,9,1,-3 8,9,-1 9,9