Quantcast

A community for students. Sign up today!

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

Matt71

  • 3 years ago

Using the digit 7 five time, place the basic arithmetic signs in between the digits to obtain a total of 540

  • This Question is Closed
  1. pratu043
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    nice question.....

  2. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I know, it's been driving me nuts

  3. pratu043
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    can you join two 7s together to form 77?

  4. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Nah, you gotta put the signs in between each one

  5. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    You're going crazy, aren't you?

  6. Stom
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    this question is right r u sure?

  7. Stom
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    because if it is not then bad things will happen

  8. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yeth, I'm pretty sure it's the question

  9. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    And now everyone's thinking...

  10. nikhil389
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    It would be fast to do with computer code, any one good with programming ?

  11. wasiqss
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    certainly question of the week

  12. Stom
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes certainly

  13. TuringTest
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 8

    if it doesn't get solved here put it in the meta-math section for future reference

  14. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I've really been trying this for a while and I think it's messed up anyone else think it's impossible?

  15. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    as in, it's total overload here

  16. jimmyrep
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    i'm not sure if this fits the rules but 77 x 7 + (7 / 7) gives 540

  17. TuringTest
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 8

    + - / and * only, right? no squaring or anything?

  18. Ishaan94
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    concatenation isn't arithmetic right? nice work jimmyrep btw

  19. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    jimmyrep, if no one can find a solution without the placing two 7s together, I'll use your solution

  20. jimmyrep
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    ok

  21. pratu043
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i don't think you can do it without joining two 7s together, jimmy rep has the right answer.

  22. jimmyrep
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    77 is probably not allowed

  23. wasiqss
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    jimmy rep yehh 77 not allowd

  24. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    It's probably not, but if it isn't I think it's impossible. I've been over this for over two hours, can't do anything to solve it. Yes, two hours, that's how obsessed I am with this question.

  25. jimmyrep
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    these types of question are obsessive!

  26. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yep

  27. pratu043
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    you can't do it because 540 is not divisible by 7.

  28. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I KNEW IT! All that time wasted, I COULD'VE BEEN PLAYING TETRIS!

  29. jimmyrep
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    lol

  30. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Sweet baby turtles, I can't believe I missed that fact

  31. TuringTest
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 8

    that doesn't make a difference, you can make four 5's into 26 even though 26 is not divisible by 5 5*5+(5/5)

  32. pratu043
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Oh I see.....

  33. moyo
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    in jimmy's example, he used 7/7 to add 1...

  34. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Oh, yeah, then my time HASN't been a complete waste

  35. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Good observation...

  36. moyo
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    are parentheses allowed?

  37. TuringTest
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 8

    I would think so... it's just multiplication

  38. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yeah

  39. moyo
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i was thinking maybe there was an order of operations trick to solving it or something... grasping at straws :-)

  40. shadowfiend
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    You don't need them though, order of operations takes care of the problem above.

  41. jimmyrep
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    yes - i didn't need the parenthesis

  42. sandra
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    It all depends on if digits can be stacked without operations (is 77 valid?) - in which case 7*77+7/7 works as jimmyrep mentioned

  43. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    question y u no make sense? ლ(ಠ益ಠლ)

  44. shadowfiend
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I feel like concatenation is needed here though. I'm not sure there's another way to grow the number fast enough while reserving 7/7 to make the difference of 1 you need to get to 540 itself.

  45. wasiqss
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    this is certainly a crap question because 540 is not divisible by 7 and i advise ppl to stop wastin time on it

  46. TuringTest
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 8

    I already pointed out that the fact that 540 is not divisible by 7 makes no difference, read above

  47. TuringTest
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 8

    the problem is sitting in meta-math now, so it can be viewed in the future by someone who can figure this out, or prove it to be impossible.

  48. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Sooooooo, you can't get a straight answer right?

  49. TuringTest
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 8

    not here, not now...

  50. Tomas.A
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    this is correct answer

  51. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Bummer huh

  52. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Oh, well, guys I don't want to completely waste all your time

  53. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    So, if everyone please get together with the plan and just randomly give everyone you can medals!

  54. TuringTest
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 8

    Like I say, check the meta-math section in the future, someone will probably either find the answer or prove it impossible... eventually.

  55. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Thanks, to everyone, for all the help

  56. Stom
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    what an awesome way to waste time

  57. TuringTest
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 8

    :)

  58. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Well, medals or wasted time right? Might as well

  59. Stom
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    but to prove it impossible without a computers help is going to be interesting

  60. TuringTest
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 8

    moneybird has a knack for this kind of thing, but he's not around.

  61. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yep, but it's gonna take a looot of time and luck

  62. Matt71
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yeah, something about koalas that makes him as smart as he is

  63. TuringTest
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 8

    jejeje...

  64. Stom
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yo

  65. Stom
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    why r ppl still on this question, u u ppl stil solving it?

  66. TuringTest
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 8

    I'm thinking it is impossible: adding 7/7=1 is the only way I can see to get to a number that is not divisible by 7, which only leaves three 7's left over, and the most we can make that into is 7*7*7=343 taking 540-(7/7)=539 and 539/7=77 hence it seems jimmyrep's answer is the only one possible, but I don't think this is a true proof that it is impossible.

  67. Janie29
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I tried a bunch of different ways, and I can't find an answer. Now I have a Chem Final in 45min., and this problem is all I'll be thinking of!

  68. Tomas.A
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    JIMMY IS CORRECT :P

  69. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Ask a Question
Find more explanations on OpenStudy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.