anonymous
  • anonymous
alright so ..these really confuse me please help “If I do not quit, then I am not giving up. If I am not giving up, then I am not failing. Therefore, If I do not quit, then I am not failing.” This is an example of which property or law?
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
inductive reasoning
anonymous
  • anonymous
I think it is a property.
anonymous
  • anonymous
thats not a choice the choices are law of syllogism addition property symmeteric property or law of detachment

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
syllogism
anonymous
  • anonymous
it's stated really badly though.
anonymous
  • anonymous
do you have a book or something you're supposed to be studying from? where are these questions from?
anonymous
  • anonymous
most syllogisms come in this form: 1. All men are mortal 2. Socrates is a man 3. Socrates is mortal
amistre64
  • amistre64
rename it to something generic “If I do not quit (-q), then I am not giving up.(-g) \[-q \implies -g\] If I am not giving up,(-g) then I am not failing. (-f) \[-g \implies -f\] Therefore, If I do not quit, (-q) then I am not failing.” (-f) \[-q \implies -f\] transitive law? This is an example of which property or law?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yeah I would say the law of syllogism kind of like this pic http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs29/i/2008/163/0/0/Law_of_Syllogism_by_Kirbychan.jpg
amistre64
  • amistre64
if a=b and b=c; then a=c; sounds transitional to me
anonymous
  • anonymous
go with amistre64, i'm incorrect.
amistre64
  • amistre64
lol, mito one upped me
amistre64
  • amistre64
id have to look up the defs of your options to see which matches
anonymous
  • anonymous
or maybe the asker could look them up and see which definition matches
anonymous
  • anonymous
i mean at that point you're not "helping" you're just straight up doing the work for him
anonymous
  • anonymous
i did look it up im just seeing what other people think i think its syllogism
anonymous
  • anonymous
lol it seems as though law of syllogism would work, cause the others don't seem right.
anonymous
  • anonymous
thanks bro ^^
amistre64
  • amistre64
The Law of Syllogism ( also called the Law of Transitivity ) states: if p=>q and q=>r are both true, then p=>r is true. - from some internet site
amistre64
  • amistre64
so it was transvestiality in sheeps clothing lol
anonymous
  • anonymous
Haha nice^
anonymous
  • anonymous
yea i read that to ..thanks for your help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
No problem, any time.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.