Ace school

with brainly

  • Get help from millions of students
  • Learn from experts with step-by-step explanations
  • Level-up by helping others

A community for students.

alright so ..these really confuse me please help “If I do not quit, then I am not giving up. If I am not giving up, then I am not failing. Therefore, If I do not quit, then I am not failing.” This is an example of which property or law?

Mathematics
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

inductive reasoning
I think it is a property.
thats not a choice the choices are law of syllogism addition property symmeteric property or law of detachment

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

syllogism
it's stated really badly though.
do you have a book or something you're supposed to be studying from? where are these questions from?
most syllogisms come in this form: 1. All men are mortal 2. Socrates is a man 3. Socrates is mortal
rename it to something generic “If I do not quit (-q), then I am not giving up.(-g) \[-q \implies -g\] If I am not giving up,(-g) then I am not failing. (-f) \[-g \implies -f\] Therefore, If I do not quit, (-q) then I am not failing.” (-f) \[-q \implies -f\] transitive law? This is an example of which property or law?
Yeah I would say the law of syllogism kind of like this pic http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs29/i/2008/163/0/0/Law_of_Syllogism_by_Kirbychan.jpg
if a=b and b=c; then a=c; sounds transitional to me
go with amistre64, i'm incorrect.
lol, mito one upped me
id have to look up the defs of your options to see which matches
or maybe the asker could look them up and see which definition matches
i mean at that point you're not "helping" you're just straight up doing the work for him
i did look it up im just seeing what other people think i think its syllogism
lol it seems as though law of syllogism would work, cause the others don't seem right.
thanks bro ^^
The Law of Syllogism ( also called the Law of Transitivity ) states: if p=>q and q=>r are both true, then p=>r is true. - from some internet site
so it was transvestiality in sheeps clothing lol
Haha nice^
yea i read that to ..thanks for your help!
No problem, any time.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question