Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

asnaseer Group Title

Reposting puzzle since no one has solved it yet: You are allowed to use any number of mathematical operators or functions (e.g. +, -, *, /, sin, cos, tan, factorial, sqrt, powers, etc) EXCEPT floor and ceiling functions. The only constants that can appear in the solution are two digits - both of which must be '2'. Use these rules to make the number 5.

  • 2 years ago
  • 2 years ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. FoolForMath Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Can we use decimal point?

    • 2 years ago
  2. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes - looks like you may have found one of the solutions (I know 2 ways of doing this) :-)

    • 2 years ago
  3. FoolForMath Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Well, don't you know I am the smart one? :P :D

    • 2 years ago
  4. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    of course I do :-)

    • 2 years ago
  5. FoolForMath Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Anyways, I won't spoil the problem for others, but here is something related http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2_%2B_2_%3D_5

    • 2 years ago
  6. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Wow - I guess you really do learn something new everyday - I was not aware of this - thx

    • 2 years ago
  7. FoolForMath Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    You are welcome :)

    • 2 years ago
  8. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    btw - there is a more /pure/ solution which does not involve using a decimal point

    • 2 years ago
  9. FoolForMath Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    I suppose we can't use variable substitution too, isn't ?

    • 2 years ago
  10. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    what do you mean @FoolForMath?

    • 2 years ago
  11. Zed Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    do the powers need to be 2 or anything?

    • 2 years ago
  12. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    remember the rules @Zed - you can ONLY have two constants in the resulting expressions and BOTH must be the digit '2'

    • 2 years ago
  13. Zed Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    ahh i see, read the question wrong

    • 2 years ago
  14. FoolForMath Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Hm something like this: x=2; x^x + x^(x-x) = 5 :D wait that's with only one 2 :D

    • 2 years ago
  15. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    no sorry @FoolForMath - that is not allowed.

    • 2 years ago
  16. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    CLUE: the /purer/ solution involves right-angled triangles

    • 2 years ago
  17. FoolForMath Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Hm then how about this one \( \csc^2(\cot^{-1}(2)) \) , Checking: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Csc%5BArcCot%5B2%5D%5D%5E2

    • 2 years ago
  18. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    thats the one! - well done @FoolForMath can the others find the other solution?

    • 2 years ago
  19. FoolForMath Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Thanks asnaseer :) Should I deleted it ?

    • 2 years ago
  20. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    5=cosec^2(arctan(2))

    • 2 years ago
  21. Zed Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Well done FoolForMath

    • 2 years ago
  22. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    that is how I wrote it to avoid the "-1"

    • 2 years ago
  23. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1325595329168:dw|

    • 2 years ago
  24. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    no need to delete your answer - lets see if anyone can find the other way of doing this

    • 2 years ago
  25. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    CLUE for other way: uses one decimal point, one squareroot and one power

    • 2 years ago
  26. FoolForMath Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    The other one is a bit hard in my opinion, I have seen this problem before sooo ;) anyways, the latex version of my solution \( \csc^2(\arccot(2)) \)

    • 2 years ago
  27. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    \(cosec^2(arccot(2))\)

    • 2 years ago
  28. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I wrote arctan above which was wrong.

    • 2 years ago
  29. FoolForMath Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    btw hey your earlier post is not correct 5 \( \neq \)cosec^2(arctan(2))

    • 2 years ago
  30. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    snap!

    • 2 years ago
  31. FoolForMath Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    wait, arccot is defined in latex no ?

    • 2 years ago
  32. FoolForMath Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    See: \[ \arccot \arctan \]

    • 2 years ago
  33. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    hmmm...

    • 2 years ago
  34. Zed Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    okay i think this is right \[\sqrt{0.2^{-2}}=5\]

    • 2 years ago
  35. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yup - you got it @Zed - well done!

    • 2 years ago
  36. FoolForMath Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    yep! you got that right :)

    • 2 years ago
  37. Zed Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yay! That was tricky :)

    • 2 years ago
  38. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    the only thing I don't like about this way is that sqrt(x) is really x^-1/2

    • 2 years ago
  39. Zed Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yeah i agree

    • 2 years ago
  40. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    so it /feels/ like cheating - but nevertheless - well done @Zed

    • 2 years ago
  41. FoolForMath Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Hero wants hard, lets give him a bit harder :D I just found two other ways of getting the same result, could anybody wanna try ?

    • 2 years ago
  42. FoolForMath Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Guys if you are trying, then please note it is not a good one and the second is ugly lol, and there is not much of useful maths we can learn from those two.

    • 2 years ago
  43. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    no - I was just waiting for @Hero to return to take up the challenge :-)

    • 2 years ago
  44. FoolForMath Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    lol :D asnaseer, wanna try something from my sleeve ? ;)

    • 2 years ago
  45. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    gulp! - I know your reputation @FoolForMath - but lets for it - you gonna post to the left?

    • 2 years ago
  46. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    *lets GO for it

    • 2 years ago
  47. FoolForMath Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    yeah sure :D

    • 2 years ago
  48. ixforrest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ummm this is kind o really easy.. at first I thought it was hard but i realized i was thinking too much.... 2^2 +2^3 = (12)^2 = 144 /2 = 72 /2 =36 /2 =18/2 =9 √9 = 3+2 = 5

    • 2 years ago
  49. ixforrest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    no need for big guns this was basic problem solving skills

    • 2 years ago
  50. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    you didn't read the rules properly - the ONLY constants allowed are two digits - both of which must be the digit 2. e.g. 2^2+2^3 uses three 2's and a 3 - breaking the rules.

    • 2 years ago
  51. ixforrest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    eh it was one of three or four answers ive got more. threre is also something interesting that happens between radians, but let me guess the implied conversion of a radian as 180 counts as a number other than 2 ? I still dont believe this requires higher level math I will stab at this later for now I have a date w/ Mathematica 8 and a vat of coffee. Thanks for clarifying !

    • 2 years ago
  52. asnaseer Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    :-D - enjoy the coffee!

    • 2 years ago
  53. ixforrest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    always!

    • 2 years ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.