pset3 problem1. sos. i can't make recursive one
can anybody give me some hint please?
MIT 6.00 Intro Computer Science (OCW)
Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
The two functions should return the number of occurrences of key in target.
You can check my version here: http://codepad.org/qz73jpja
I also joined two diagrams to help you visualize the code.
Let's review first the code of your iterative version. My first objection is that you always return None, even if you print occurrences when you find them. You should have a variable which counts how many times you find the key. Now you iterate over the target, starting with position 0, if you find the key at position n, increment your counter and search again starting at position n+1. As soon as you don't find the key, return the number of occurrences you have found.
Now let's look at the recursive version. You did pretty well and almost found the answer, since you call the same function with a shorter target (hence it is a simplified version of the same problem). You should only ask yourself: what do I want to return when I don't find the key -> you should return 0. And when I find the key? -> 1 + return from the shorter target.
I hope I made it clear, but let me know if it is not enough !