Quantcast

A community for students. Sign up today!

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

mitosuki

  • 3 years ago

Star 3 is 138 light years away from Star 1 and 75 light years away from Star 2. Which of these conclusions about the stars is correct? Answer The light from Star 2 reaches Star 1 in 63 years. Star 2 is 63 kilometers away from Star 3. Star 2 is 213 miles away from Star 3. The light from Star 2 reaches Star 1 in 213 years.

  • This Question is Closed
  1. dabears900
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    If the second one is suppose to be light years vs kilometers I would pick that one because you don't know in which direction star 1 or star 2 is in reference to star 3. And it wouldnt make sense to have kilometers in astronomical terms as that would be infitesmly small in those terms

  2. dabears900
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    1 km = 1.057×10^-13 light years

  3. mitosuki
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Oh ok I think, its the first answer, no?

  4. simarilli
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 6

    None of the conclusions are correct. 1) Requires the assumption that Star two is collinear with Star one and three and between them. 2) We do not know position of the stars relative to each other, so we cannot claim this. Also, kilometres are far too small for working on a cosmic scale 3) Miles are also far too small; again we do not know the relative positions of the stars. 4) Requires assumption that Star 2 is collinear with Star 1 and Star 3, is at the far end from 1. So, we can see that none of the conclusions logically follow from the available data.

  5. fewscrewsmissing
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Honestly, I would say none of the conclusions are correct, since no information is given about their relative positions to one another. If you assume they are all in a straight line, then only first inference could be made, but I wouldn't call it a conclusion.

  6. tmrk
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yeah i also think it is the first one

  7. mitosuki
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Thank you everyone

  8. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Ask a Question
Find more explanations on OpenStudy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.