anonymous
  • anonymous
please find out the time period of the following system
Physics
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1326468874952:dw|
JamesJ
  • JamesJ
First write down the equation of motion. What do you get?
anonymous
  • anonymous
i'm thinkin 2pi/sqrt((k1+k2)/m)

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

JamesJ
  • JamesJ
You've jumped to the answer. What's the physics behind that? Write down the equation of motion. F = ma = my'' = ....
anonymous
  • anonymous
see there is SHM used
JamesJ
  • JamesJ
There are three forces acting on the mass. Write F_g for the force due to gravity, F_1 for the force from the top spring, F_2 for the force from the bottom spring. Let's use y as the vertical coordinate with upwards being the positive y direction. Suppose the system is a rest when \( y = y_0 \). Then when the mass is at some other y, the force of both springs is in the same direction. For example, when \( y > y_0 \), the top spring pushes down and the bottom spring pulls down. Hence the force of the two springs \[ F_1 + F_2 = -k_1(y-y_0) - k_2(y-y_0) \] \[ = -(k_1+k_2)y + (k_1y_0 + k_2y_0) \] Now the force of gravity is \[ F_g = -mg \] hence the total force acting on the mass is \[ F = F_1 + F_2 + F_g \] \[ = -(k_1+k_2)y + (k_1y_0 + k_2y_0 + mg) \] Now we also know by Newton's second law that \[ F = ma_y \] where \( a_y \) is the acceleration in the y direction and \( a_y = d^2y/dt^2 \), hence \[ m \frac{d^2y}{dt^2} + (k_1+k_2)y = (k_1y_0 + k_2y_0) \] \[ \frac{d^2y}{dt^2} + \frac{k_1 + k_2}{m} y = \frac{k_1y_0 + k_2y_0}{m} \] The constant on the RHS is irrelevant for the period and frequency of the system. We can find the period from the coefficient of y; it is \[ T = 2\pi / \sqrt{ \frac{k_1 + k_2}{m} } \]
JamesJ
  • JamesJ
i.e., \[ T = 2\pi \sqrt{ \frac{m}{k_1+k_2} } \]
JamesJ
  • JamesJ
What Jetly has written down is a stab at what happens if the springs are in series. But here they are not, so her/his solution is not correct.
anonymous
  • anonymous
@james could you explain what you mean by "Springs in series"?
JamesJ
  • JamesJ
Left picture, two springs in parallel Right picture, two springs in series The terms "In parallel" and "in series" come from electronics and circuits, where we talk about resisters being in parallel or in series. If you don't know circuits, then forget about that part of it altogether, and just focus on the springs in the picture.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I did not get why this question is not the same as the picture on the left,If you move down by x from equilibrium,Then in both cases the extensions in both the strings is x itself so wouldn't you get the same equations?
JamesJ
  • JamesJ
Right. This system is almost identical to the one on the left yes. The period of oscillation is the same. What's different is the argument for finding the coefficient of y (or x) is a little more subtle. The other big difference is something we don't need in this problem: the equilibrium point.
anonymous
  • anonymous
this differentiation thing! in physics takes out the life! for that everyone cannot be a well-learned person like james!
anonymous
  • anonymous
hahaha true said
anonymous
  • anonymous
all-learned person like james*

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.