A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

anonymous

  • 5 years ago

What are the missing reasons in the two-column proof? Given: JM=ML and m<jmk>m<kml Prove: JK > KL https://www.connexus.com/content/media/464267-1122011-65407-PM-1945714120.png

  • This Question is Closed
  1. anonymous
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    1.JM=ML 1.given 2.Km=Km 2.______ 3.m<JMK>m<KML 3.given 4.JK>KL 4. _______

  2. ash2326
    • 5 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    KM=KM it's the same shared side so it'll be equal given angle JMK> angle KML we know that side opposite to larger angle is larger than the side opposite to the smaller angle so JK which is opposite to angle JMK is larger than KL which is opposite to angle KML => JK>KL

  3. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.