Ace school

with brainly

  • Get help from millions of students
  • Learn from experts with step-by-step explanations
  • Level-up by helping others

A community for students.

well but arent the western countries only interested in human rights violation in context of their national interest but are unconcerned and have even endorsed puppet rulers in the developing world?whats ur take on that

History
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

An ugly side of international politics and finance. Quite often the 'West' endorses one side/person rather than another for the 'better the devil you know' reason. And then the silent majority or quite often 'Minorities' are the ones to suffer. There is though a growing sense of outrage at these practices among the people of the West and they have been forcing their governments to mend their ways, a slow process with the potential for many mistakes on the way.
the ppl were fooled by lbj in the vietnam war and very late did they realize that they were losing their troops
That was an interesting one as the view of violations concerned the evils of Communism on the country rather than the typical violations like repression, trial without jury, etc. This was very much a political/military influence decision as the US needed a foothold in Indo-China. The continuance of corruption was of importance to the leaders of the south and this played into the American military mindset, turn a blind eye if we keep the Commies out.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

and what do u knw about the neoconservative lobby that propogated the red menace is a threat to ameicans played a major role?

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question