At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
since those are your zeros, multiply them up
given intercepts at: a,b,c,d, then: (x-a)(x-b)(x-c)(x-d)=0 will give you your basic equation
then determine that value of that basic for x=-1 and see what you have to scale by to get it to -6
decimals are fine for factors; but can be written in other ways
the issue is in the scalar; most likely its a 2 to account for that
what do you mean by scalar?
its that "a" in front you have a basic equation that can be scaled up or down to fine tune it and keep the same intercepts
x^2 -1 has the same intercepts as 2(x^2-1) but the graph hits a new set of points everywhere else
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28x%2B3%29%28x%2B0.5%29%28x-1%29%28x-2%29%2C+x%3D-1 the wolf say the basic equation is good; x=-1 is approx -6
i see, with the 2x+1 part youve actually doubled it so you have to divide it back out for the "a"
yeah that's the problem :(
at any rate, your setup was fine.
i don't know whether i should use x+0.5 or 2x+1
2(x+.5) = (2x+1) so its really just a matter of what the author of your text has decided to go with
2x+1 = 0 when x=-.5 x+.5 = 0 when x = -.5
their choice to double it to begin with accounts for a difference in the scalars you choose for "a"
but after everything is expanded out, it should be the same
yours \[x^4+0.5 x^3-7. x^2+2.5 x+3\] theirs \[x^4+x^3/2-7 x^2+(5 x)/2+3\]
oh kk thanks!