wel i hav some doubts on 1d motion pls cm here

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions.

A community for students.

wel i hav some doubts on 1d motion pls cm here

Physics
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

1.how can i understand how acceleration and displacemenyt varies from a displacement time graph??
srry accleration and velocity i meant
based on that tell me hw the sign in varous intervals OA ,,AB ,BC and CD is -, 0 ,+ ,0

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

|dw:1327309166279:dw|
Imagine a simple case of a parabolic x vs. t graph. We find that the equation of the line on the graph is\[x = 10 t^2\]As would be the case in constant acceleration. Now, we know that velocity is defined as the change in distance over the change in time. In differential form this is\[v = {dx \over dt}\]And additionally, that acceleration is the change in velocity over the change in time. Again, in differential form, this is\[a = {dv \over dt} = {d^2 x \over dt^2}\] It can readily be seen, that to find the velocity of the above displacement equation, we simply differentiate with respect to time. \[v = 20 t\]and then differential the velocity with respect to time to find the acceleration.\[a = 20\]
i mean sign of acceleration
eashmore i asked how we can evaluate from the graph
look the graph
There are infinite possibilities to your second question. But since we have observed that \[a = {d^2 x \over dt^2}\]it is apparent that acceleration is the second derivative of the x vs. t curve.
My method still holds. Use the principles you learned in Calculus and the above differentials to draw conclusions.
2.|dw:1327309473228:dw|
here its a smooth in clined planethe time taken to reach bttom is sqr(2l/g)
i dont understand why we can use s=1/2gt^2 directly here
ipls help
but the answer is sqr(2l/g)
we just applied equaion of motion just as usual why??
|dw:1327309719031:dw|
it is said that acceleration of A and B are in ratio tan 60 to tan 30 how????
helo pls help
Patience....
k
Lines A and B have no acceleration. They are constant velocity plots. The second derivative of a straight line is zero.
are u sure?/
If that is a displacement vs. time graph, and lines A and B are straight, then yes, I'm 100% sure.
y is a=0??
I told you why. Because the second derivative of a straight line is zero.
k tel me the othr one
I don't think it is right either. The time it takes to reach the bottom will be\[T = \sqrt{2l \over g \sin(\theta)}\]
yea i agree with that t=sqrt(2l/g sin theta)
but it is not there in options
1 Attachment
Let's analyze the equations of motion here. The only force acting on the particle moving down the incline is that of gravity. Therefore, we can say with certainty that\[\vec a = -g\]From the definition of acceleration, we can also say that\[\vec a = { d \vec v \over dt}\]Separating variables\[d \vec v = \vec a dt\]Integrating\[\int\limits d \vec v = \int\limits \vec a dt \rightarrow \vec v = \vec a *t\]By the same token, we can observe that\[\vec s = \vec v_0*t+ {1 \over 2} \vec a *t^2\]Take careful note of the fact that displacement, velocity, and acceleration are vector quantities. Now, let's analyze the kinematics of the problem. Let's fix a frame such that \(\hat i\) is directed from the top of the incline to the bottom and parallel to the inclined surface, \(\hat j\) is directed away from the inclined surface and perpendicular to the inclined surface, and \(\hat k\) is \(\hat i \times \hat j\). We will also fix a ground, inertial frame with unit vectors \((\hat I,\hat J,\hat K)\)|dw:1327390446864:dw|Observe that the direction cosines are \[\left(\begin{matrix}\hat i = \cos(\theta) \hat I - \sin(\theta) \hat J \\ \hat j = \sin(\theta) \hat I + \cos(\theta) \hat J\end{matrix}\right)\]Let's also observe that\[\vec a = -g \hat J\]and, from the above direction cosines, that\[\vec a = g \sin(\theta) \hat i\]The particle will move along the inclined plane with a displacement of \[\vec s = l \hat i\]From the equation I gave earlier for displacement, we can observe that\[l \hat i = \vec v_0 \hat i * t + {1 \over 2} g \sin(\theta) \hat i * t^2\]Simplifying by observing that \(v_0 = 0\), and that \(\hat i\) cancels out through all terms, we get\[l = {1 \over 2} g \sin(\theta) \cdot t^2\]Solving for \(t\)\[t = \sqrt{ 2l \over g \sin(\theta)}\]This isn't an answer choice, so let's see if we can manipulate it to match one of the answers. Observe from trigonometry that\[\sin(\theta) = \frac{h}{l}\]Solving for \(l\)\[l = {h \over \sin(\theta)}\]Let's substitute this into our expression for \(t\), yielding\[t = \sqrt{2 h \over g \sin^2(\theta)}\]Removing \(\sin(\theta)\) from the radical yields, \[t = \arcsin(\theta) \sqrt{2 h \over g}\]which appears to be answer choice c.
hey i got the answer but there is no arc sin theta
\[\arcsin(\theta) = {1 \over \sin(\theta)}\]
lol
k i got it ithought it was sin inverse
\[\arcsin(\theta) = {1 \over \sin(\theta)} = \sin^{-1}(\theta)\]
hey thts not
1/sin theta is cosec theta
Yeah. You're right.
Just pretend like it is here.
:)

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question